(ctrl) and (+) magnifies screen if type too small.              me         quotes             scripture verse             footnotes       Words of Jesus      Links

3/23/2021     Yesterday     Tomorrow


Judges 13 - 15



The Birth of Samson

Judges 13 1 And the people of Israel again did what was evil in the sight of the Lord, so the Lord gave them into the hand of the Philistines for forty years.

2 There was a certain man of Zorah, of the tribe of the Danites, whose name was Manoah. And his wife was barren and had no children. 3 And the angel of the Lord appeared to the woman and said to her, “Behold, you are barren and have not borne children, but you shall conceive and bear a son. 4 Therefore be careful and drink no wine or strong drink, and eat nothing unclean, 5 for behold, you shall conceive and bear a son. No razor shall come upon his head, for the child shall be a Nazirite to God from the womb, and he shall begin to save Israel from the hand of the Philistines.” 6 Then the woman came and told her husband, “A man of God came to me, and his appearance was like the appearance of the angel of God, very awesome. I did not ask him where he was from, and he did not tell me his name, 7 but he said to me, ‘Behold, you shall conceive and bear a son. So then drink no wine or strong drink, and eat nothing unclean, for the child shall be a Nazirite to God from the womb to the day of his death.’”

8 Then Manoah prayed to the Lord and said, “O Lord, please let the man of God whom you sent come again to us and teach us what we are to do with the child who will be born.” 9 And God listened to the voice of Manoah, and the angel of God came again to the woman as she sat in the field. But Manoah her husband was not with her. 10 So the woman ran quickly and told her husband, “Behold, the man who came to me the other day has appeared to me.” 11 And Manoah arose and went after his wife and came to the man and said to him, “Are you the man who spoke to this woman?” And he said, “I am.” 12 And Manoah said, “Now when your words come true, what is to be the child's manner of life, and what is his mission?” 13 And the angel of the Lord said to Manoah, “Of all that I said to the woman let her be careful. 14 She may not eat of anything that comes from the vine, neither let her drink wine or strong drink, or eat any unclean thing. All that I commanded her let her observe.”

15 Manoah said to the angel of the Lord, “Please let us detain you and prepare a young goat for you.” 16 And the angel of the Lord said to Manoah, “If you detain me, I will not eat of your food. But if you prepare a burnt offering, then offer it to the Lord.” (For Manoah did not know that he was the angel of the Lord.) 17 And Manoah said to the angel of the Lord, “What is your name, so that, when your words come true, we may honor you?” 18 And the angel of the Lord said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?” 19 So Manoah took the young goat with the grain offering, and offered it on the rock to the Lord, to the one who works wonders, and Manoah and his wife were watching. 20 And when the flame went up toward heaven from the altar, the angel of the Lord went up in the flame of the altar. Now Manoah and his wife were watching, and they fell on their faces to the ground.

21 The angel of the Lord appeared no more to Manoah and to his wife. Then Manoah knew that he was the angel of the Lord. 22 And Manoah said to his wife, “We shall surely die, for we have seen God.” 23 But his wife said to him, “If the Lord had meant to kill us, he would not have accepted a burnt offering and a grain offering at our hands, or shown us all these things, or now announced to us such things as these.” 24 And the woman bore a son and called his name Samson. And the young man grew, and the Lord blessed him. 25 And the Spirit of the Lord began to stir him in Mahaneh-dan, between Zorah and Eshtaol.

Judges 14

Samson's Marriage

Judges 14 1 Samson went down to Timnah, and at Timnah he saw one of the daughters of the Philistines. 2 Then he came up and told his father and mother, “I saw one of the daughters of the Philistines at Timnah. Now get her for me as my wife.” 3 But his father and mother said to him, “Is there not a woman among the daughters of your relatives, or among all our people, that you must go to take a wife from the uncircumcised Philistines?” But Samson said to his father, “Get her for me, for she is right in my eyes.”

4 His father and mother did not know that it was from the Lord, for he was seeking an opportunity against the Philistines. At that time the Philistines ruled over Israel.

5 Then Samson went down with his father and mother to Timnah, and they came to the vineyards of Timnah. And behold, a young lion came toward him roaring. 6 Then the Spirit of the Lord rushed upon him, and although he had nothing in his hand, he tore the lion in pieces as one tears a young goat. But he did not tell his father or his mother what he had done. 7 Then he went down and talked with the woman, and she was right in Samson's eyes.

8 After some days he returned to take her. And he turned aside to see the carcass of the lion, and behold, there was a swarm of bees in the body of the lion, and honey. 9 He scraped it out into his hands and went on, eating as he went. And he came to his father and mother and gave some to them, and they ate. But he did not tell them that he had scraped the honey from the carcass of the lion.

10 His father went down to the woman, and Samson prepared a feast there, for so the young men used to do. 11 As soon as the people saw him, they brought thirty companions to be with him. 12 And Samson said to them, “Let me now put a riddle to you. If you can tell me what it is, within the seven days of the feast, and find it out, then I will give you thirty linen garments and thirty changes of clothes, 13 but if you cannot tell me what it is, then you shall give me thirty linen garments and thirty changes of clothes.” And they said to him, “Put your riddle, that we may hear it.” 14 And he said to them,

“Out of the eater came something to eat.
Out of the strong came something sweet.”

And in three days they could not solve the riddle.

15 On the fourth day they said to Samson's wife, “Entice your husband to tell us what the riddle is, lest we burn you and your father's house with fire. Have you invited us here to impoverish us?” 16 And Samson's wife wept over him and said, “You only hate me; you do not love me. You have put a riddle to my people, and you have not told me what it is.” And he said to her, “Behold, I have not told my father nor my mother, and shall I tell you?” 17 She wept before him the seven days that their feast lasted, and on the seventh day he told her, because she pressed him hard. Then she told the riddle to her people. 18 And the men of the city said to him on the seventh day before the sun went down,

“What is sweeter than honey?
What is stronger than a lion?”

And he said to them,

“If you had not plowed with my heifer,
you would not have found out my riddle.”

19 And the Spirit of the Lord rushed upon him, and he went down to Ashkelon and struck down thirty men of the town and took their spoil and gave the garments to those who had told the riddle. In hot anger he went back to his father's house. 20 And Samson's wife was given to his companion, who had been his best man.


Judges 15

Samson Defeats the Philistines

Judges 15 1 After some days, at the time of wheat harvest, Samson went to visit his wife with a young goat. And he said, “I will go in to my wife in the chamber.” But her father would not allow him to go in. 2 And her father said, “I really thought that you utterly hated her, so I gave her to your companion. Is not her younger sister more beautiful than she? Please take her instead.” 3 And Samson said to them, “This time I shall be innocent in regard to the Philistines, when I do them harm.” 4 So Samson went and caught 300 foxes and took torches. And he turned them tail to tail and put a torch between each pair of tails. 5 And when he had set fire to the torches, he let the foxes go into the standing grain of the Philistines and set fire to the stacked grain and the standing grain, as well as the olive orchards. 6 Then the Philistines said, “Who has done this?” And they said, “Samson, the son-in-law of the Timnite, because he has taken his wife and given her to his companion.” And the Philistines came up and burned her and her father with fire. 7 And Samson said to them, “If this is what you do, I swear I will be avenged on you, and after that I will quit.” 8 And he struck them hip and thigh with a great blow, and he went down and stayed in the cleft of the rock of Etam.

9 Then the Philistines came up and encamped in Judah and made a raid on Lehi. 10 And the men of Judah said, “Why have you come up against us?” They said, “We have come up to bind Samson, to do to him as he did to us.” 11 Then 3,000 men of Judah went down to the cleft of the rock of Etam, and said to Samson, “Do you not know that the Philistines are rulers over us? What then is this that you have done to us?” And he said to them, “As they did to me, so have I done to them.” 12 And they said to him, “We have come down to bind you, that we may give you into the hands of the Philistines.” And Samson said to them, “Swear to me that you will not attack me yourselves.” 13 They said to him, “No; we will only bind you and give you into their hands. We will surely not kill you.” So they bound him with two new ropes and brought him up from the rock.

14 When he came to Lehi, the Philistines came shouting to meet him. Then the Spirit of the LORD rushed upon him, and the ropes that were on his arms became as flax that has caught fire, and his bonds melted off his hands. 15 And he found a fresh jawbone of a donkey, and put out his hand and took it, and with it he struck 1,000 men. 16 And Samson said,

“With the jawbone of a donkey,
heaps upon heaps,
with the jawbone of a donkey
have I struck down a thousand men.”

17 As soon as he had finished speaking, he threw away the jawbone out of his hand. And that place was called Ramath-lehi.

18 And he was very thirsty, and he called upon the LORD and said, “You have granted this great salvation by the hand of your servant, and shall I now die of thirst and fall into the hands of the uncircumcised?” 19 And God split open the hollow place that is at Lehi, and water came out from it. And when he drank, his spirit returned, and he revived. Therefore the name of it was called En-hakkore; it is at Lehi to this day. 20 And he judged Israel in the days of the Philistines twenty years.

ESV Study Bible


What I'm Reading

In the Dungeon of Giant Despair

By Andrew McGowan 1/2006

     At one point on their pilgrimage, Christian and his companion Hopeful stepped aside from the true Way, into By-Path-Meadow, because it looked easier and seemed to be going in the same direction as the Way. Soon they realized their mistake and began the journey back towards the Way. As they traveled, they slept one night on the grounds of a castle, but it turned out that this was Doubting-Castle, owned by Giant Despair. When the giant found them, he threw them into his dark and nasty dungeon, and they suffered terribly, from capture on Wednesday until escape on Sunday.

     On Thursday, at the suggestion of his wife, Diffidence, Giant Despair beat them severely and mercilessly. On Friday he told them to kill themselves since there was no hope for them. On Saturday, angered that they had not committed suicide, he showed them the bones of those he had previously murdered by tearing them to pieces. He assured them that their end would come soon in the same manner. Then he beat them again.

     At midnight on Saturday, despite their wounds, Christian and Hopeful began to pray (like Paul and Silas in Acts 16:25), and they continued this prayer throughout the night. Then we read of the amazing escape: “Now a little before it was Day, good Christian, as one half amazed, brake out in this passionate speech; ‘What a fool,’ quoth he, ‘am I, thus to lie in a stinking dungeon, when I may as well walk at liberty? I have a key in my bosom, called Promise, that will I am persuaded open any lock in Doubting-Castle.’ Using the key, Christian and Hopeful escaped.”

     The Meaning | There are at least two lessons to be learned from this incident in Pilgrim’s Progress (Bunyan): Updated, Modern English. More than 100 Illustrations.. The first lesson concerns the importance of keeping to the Way, no matter how much easier or more attractive the alternatives might seem. Many Christians have made shipwreck of their lives by following the ways of the world and emulating the values, ambitions, and lifestyles of their non-Christian neighbors, or their society, rather than following Christ. It is very easy to persuade ourselves that our situation is exceptional or that our circumstances warrant making a decision that goes contrary to Scripture. The end justifies the means, we say. This is never true. Keep to the Way.

     The second and key lesson, however, concerns assurance. The most striking part of the story is where Christian realizes that he had the key all the time! There was no need for them to have spent even one hour in the dungeon. Sadly, Christian had forgotten that he had the key in his possession. What was the key? Well, it was the key called “Promise,” and because he had this key, there was no need to be in Doubting-Castle as a prisoner of Giant Despair. In modern language, Christian had in his possession all of the promises of God, and therefore he had no need to be a captive to despair. Christian ought to have trusted in God and His promises. Had he done so, he would not have been the prisoner of doubt and despair.

     The Doctrine | At the heart of this incident from Pilgrim’s Progress is the issue of the assurance of salvation. How can I be sure that I am a Christian and so avoid doubt and despair? Christians in the Reformed tradition have not always agreed on this doctrine. Some have argued that assurance is of the very essence of saving faith and should, therefore, be the possession of every Christian. Others, including those who wrote the Westminster Confession of Faith (18.3), have argued that assurance may be (and indeed ought to be) the possession of every Christian, but that it does not automatically accompany saving faith. Rather, they say, it often comes later, as men and women reflect upon the work of the Holy Spirit in their lives.

     The great Scottish theologian Thomas Boston (1676–1732), recognized that there was some truth in both of these positions. He held to the position of the Westminster Confession of Faith that assurance of salvation is not of the essence of saving faith, and so there are many people who are true believers and yet lack assurance. He spoke of those who go to heaven “in as a mist,” truly converted yet unsure of their salvation. At the same time, however, he recognized that there is a certain assurance, or “appropriating persuasion,” that is indeed a constituent element in saving faith. It seems wise to follow Boston in this matter and to recognize both kinds of assurance.

     The Application | Are you going through a time of doubt or despair? Have you become a prisoner of these enemies of God and the Gospel? If you are a Christian, the wonderful truth is that you already have in your possession all that is necessary for your deliverance — you need to trust in the promises of God.

Click here to go to source

     Andrew T.B. McGowan is minister of Inverness East Church of Scotland, Professor of Theology in the University of the Highlands and Islands, and Honorary Professor in Reformed Doctrine at the University of Aberdeen.

Andrew McGowan Books:

Crossing the River

By Frank E. Farrell 1/2006

     Charles Haddon Spurgeon said he had read Pilgrim’s Progress one hundred times. Alexander Whyte said he had read it almost as often. These two giants of the British pulpit have been called the “last of the Puritans,” so thoroughly immersed were they in Puritan writings. Spurgeon gives us the key to Bunyan’s genius: “Read anything of his, and you will see that it is almost like reading the Bible itself. He had studied the Bible; he had read it till his very soul was saturated with Scripture and…he cannot give us his Pilgrim’s Progress — that sweetest of all prose poems — without continually making us feel and say, ‘Why, this man is a living Bible!’ Prick him anywhere; his blood is Bibline, the very essence of the Bible flows from him. He cannot speak without quoting a text, for his very soul is full of the Word of God.”

     The Bible was the antidote for Bunyan’s early, unpromising years, which held out little hope for his writing the most popular Protestant devotional work of the ages. This is not, to say the least, the usual expectation for a tinker (his father’s trade as well) with very little formal education. John Owen, Oxford’s Puritan theologian par excellence, who declined Harvard’s offer of its presidency, would take every opportunity to hear Bunyan preach. When King Charles II expressed surprise at this, Owen responded that he would gladly exchange all of his learning for the tinker’s ability to touch the heart. Bunyan kept his common touch: Once, when told he had preached a grand sermon, he replied, “Aye, you have no need to tell me that, for the devil whispered it to me before I was well out of the pulpit.”

     The contrast between Bunyan’s mastery of devotional English writing and his earlier unregenerate use of the language is truly staggering. In his autobiography, Grace Abounding to the Chief of Sinners, he writes: “One day, as I was standing at a neighbor’s shop window, and there cursing and swearing and playing the madman after my unwanted manner, there sat within the woman of the house, and heard me, who, though she was a very loose and ungodly wretch, yet protested that I swore and cursed at the most fearful rate that she was made to tremble to hear me; and told me further, that I was the ungodliest fellow for swearing that she had ever heard in all her life, and that I by thus doing was able to spoil all the youth in the whole town, if they came but in my company.”

     Bunyan says he was silenced and shamed by this reproof and soon after “I beetook me to my Bible.” By God’s grace in conversion and providence, the tinker would come to write what has been described as the finest piece of writing in the English language — his description in Pilgrim’s Progress of Christian’s crossing the river of death into the city of the great King. Robert Browning put it this way: “His language was not ours: ‘Tis my belief, God spake: No tinker has such powers.”

     In his unregenerate state as a church bell-ringer, he feared death from the collapse of the belfry, but later he would write of the bells of heaven ringing for joy to welcome the pilgrims who had crossed the river. He would also write of two angels who would tell Christian and Hopeful that they would have to pass through the river of death before they could enter the heavenly Jerusalem. In the crossing of the river, Christian encountered “a great darkness and horror,” but Hopeful encouraged him with words from Isaiah: “When thou passest through the waters, I will be with thee; and through the rivers, they shall not overflow thee” (KJV).

     On the other side, the two “shining Ones” met them and told them of the glory of the heavenly Jerusalem. Bunyan, “the immortal dreamer” continues: “Now I saw in my dream, that these two men went in at the gate; and lo, as they entered, they were transfigured, and they had raiment put on that shone like gold.… Then I heard in my dream, that all the bells in the city rang again for joy; and that it was said unto them, enter ye into the joy of your Lord. I also heard the men themselves, that they sang with a loud voice, saying, Blessing, Honour, Glory, and Power, be to Him that sitteth upon the throne, and to the Lamb forever and ever.… There were also of them that had wings, and they answered one another without intermission, saying, Holy, Holy, is the Lord. And after that, they shut up the gates: which when I had seen, I wished myself among them.”

     The account of the pilgrims’ glorious reception in heaven, only part of which has been quoted here, is one of the most famous scenes in literature and has been called the crown of all Bunyan’s work. In Grace Abounding, he testifies that his former fears about death had been banished to the point where he cried, “‘Let me die’; now death was lovely and beautiful in my sight, for I saw we shall never live indeed until we be gone to the other world.” Puritan Thomas Shepard, one of Harvard’s founders, strikingly called death “the very best of all our gospel ordinances.” He points out that “in all his other ordinances, Christ comes, on occasion, to us; but in a believer’s death Christ takes us to be forever with Him.”

     Another Puritan contemporary of Bunyan’s, Richard Baxter, wrote an enduring devotional classic The Saints’ Everlasting Rest, in which he urges his readers to spend half an hour every day “meditating on the joys of heaven.”

Click here to go to source

     Dr. Farrell, ordained in 1961, was a well known scholar, editor and educator in church history. He served as an editor for World Vision and Christianity Today magazines, and as a professor of church history and devotional classics at Simpson College in San Francisco, Nyack College in New York, and Reformed Theological Seminary in both Orlando, FL and Atlanta, GA.

Vanity Fair

By Derek Thomas 1/2006

     For John Bunyan, a Puritan to his fingertips, the Christian life was an experience of conflict and tension with this world. Imprisoned for upwards of twelve years, he experienced firsthand the world’s hostility. Cheerful and sanguine by temperament, his portrayal of what believers can expect from this world is both solemn and dark: the path that leads to the Celestial City winds through unavoidable places of considerable, even deadly, danger — places like the town called Vanity with its “lusty Fair.” Here, all the resources of protection and resolution will be needed to prevent contamination and possible destruction.

     Christian, in Bunyan’s  Pilgrim's Progress, is both a pilgrim on a journey (road-trip) to heaven and a warrior in conflict with temptations from within (indwelling sin) and without (the world in its opposition to all things godly). It is a principle that Christian is taught early in the journey that every believer can expect to be both fascinated by and drawn towards the world. He can also expect to be repulsed and attacked when all offers are spurned. “Hell hath no fury…,” in this case, “like the world scorned.”

     Vanity Fair, described in various dictionaries as the “vain and frivolous way of life especially in large cities,” and the “place or scene of ostentation or empty, idle amusement and frivolity,” represents for Bunyan the world in all its gaudiness: alluring and seductive, offering merchandise of all kinds — some innocent enough in themselves but designed to misdirect the affections away from our love for God and our love for His kingdom. What is Bunyan teaching us here? Several things.

     First and foremost, Vanity Fair represents Bunyan’s attempt to warn every Christian of the reality of temptation and the need to resist it. There is always a “gospel-focus” in Bunyan’s writings, and he is careful to note that believers can resist temptation in the knowledge that their Savior has done so on their behalf: “The prince of Princes himself, when here, went through this Town to his own Country, and that upon a Fair-day too: Yea, and as I think it was Beelzebub, the chief Lord of this Fair, that invited him to buy of his Vanities; yea, would have him made Lord of the Fair, would he but have done him Reverence as he went through the Town.”

     Vanity Fair thus signals the need to “Keep watch on yourself, lest you too be tempted” (Gal. 6:1), with the assurance that “we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin” (Heb. 4:15).

     Then again, Vanity Fair establishes the truth that Christians are citizens of the kingdom of heaven and must therefore sit loose to the attractions of this world, however innocent they may appear to be in themselves. Christian and Faithful (Christian’s trusty companion) stood out “like sore thumbs” in Vanity Fair. Not only did they not purchase anything, they refused to be drawn aside and enticed by what it offered, having discovered “solid joys and lasting treasures” elsewhere in communion with Jesus Christ. As citizens of heaven they adopted the viewpoint that they must not conform to this world (Phil. 3:20).

     On offer in Vanity Fair are both material things (gold, pearls, precious stones, etc.) as well as honors (titles, preferments — designed to turn one’s head). Additionally, Bunyan mentions “the ware of Rome and her merchandise is greatly promoted in the fair” — an allusion to the beguiling nature of Roman Catholic teaching that had suggested (barely a hundred years in Bunyan’s past) that indulgences could be purchased so as to make a sinner’s journey through purgatory that much quicker. To all of these, Bunyan’s faithful companions say “No!”

Click here to go to source

     Derek W.H. Thomas is senior minister at First Presbyterian Church in Columbia, S.C., and Distinguished Visiting Professor of Systematic and Historical Theology at Reformed Theological Seminary in Atlanta. He is also editorial director of the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals and editor of its e-zine, Reformation21. Dr. Thomas is originally from Wales, and he holds a PhD from the University of Wales.

Derek Thomas Books:

     Derek Thomas Books |  Go to Books Page

The Power of His Glory

By R.C. Sproul 1/2006

     You want to know what your problem is? You don’t love Jesus enough. I know this not because I know you, but because I know me. I’ve got the same problem. My wife has the same problem, as do my kids. The sheep in my flock suffer from the same problem.

     The folks I meet at conferences have the same problem too. Wherever there is a sin-problem, underneath it all, is this problem. Husbands don’t love their wives as Jesus loves the church, because husbands don’t love Jesus enough. Children disobey their parents, because they don’t love Jesus enough. Pastors soft-pedal the Bible because they don’t love Jesus enough. And people hop from one church to another because they don’t love Jesus enough. Politicians grow power hungry because they don’t love Jesus enough. Rich people suffer from greed, because they don’t love Jesus enough. Middle class people suffer from greed, because they don’t love Jesus enough. Poor people suffer from greed, because they don’t love Jesus enough. Find a sin and you will find there a heart that doesn’t love Jesus enough. Find Jesus, and you will find the solution to our problem. Which is just what Jesus has promised will happen.

     It is a good thing that evangelical Christians have wakened from their pietistic slumbers. It is good and proper that we should be about the business of making manifest the reign of Christ over all things. That He is Lord has effects that stray rather far from our hearts. We fight the culture wars because they are simply a manifestation of the war between the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent. But the serpent is more crafty than any of the beasts of the field. He took the biblical wisdom that argued that we ought to tend to our souls, and turned it into world-denying piety. And now he takes the biblical wisdom that argues that we must push for the crown rights of King Jesus, and turned it into worldliness, and a denial of the call to piety. Jesus, on the other hand, calls us to seek first two things, the kingdom of God and His righteousness.

     How can we seek two different things first? We do so when we realize that the weapons of our warfare, that the very engine of changing the world, is changing ourselves. The reign of Christ will be manifest in the political, social, artistic, cultural realms only insofar and only through the manifestation of the reign of Christ within His people. We will only make known the great Gospel truth that this is our Father’s world, as we live as pilgrims, recognizing that this world isn’t our home, that we are just passing through.

     It is because we are worldly that we embrace the culture’s engines of change. We think that we will change ourselves and the world only as we read more books, make more movies, elect more politicians, produce more widgets, and add more programs to our churches. We think sanctification is a doctrine to be studied, rather than a calling to be pursued. In truth, it is neither. We do not pursue a calling, but a person. Sanctification isn’t merely the means by which we become more holy, but is the means by which we become more like Jesus. Just as He, the Son of God, is the express image of the glory of the Father, so we, the bride of Christ, are the image of our eternal Husband. We glorify Him by becoming more like Him.

     This is the promise of God, the end of our sanctification, our glorification: “Beloved, we are God’s children now, and what we will be has not yet appeared; but we know that when he appears we shall be like him, because we shall see him as he is” (1 John 3:2). Do you see the connection? We don’t know what we shall be, but we do know we will be like Him. How will we be like Him? What means brings this to pass? We shall see Him as He is. This is the glory of our King, not that He labors faithfully to change us, not that He changes us by the Word of His power, but that He changes us by the power of His glory. Seeing Him makes us like Him.

     Which brings us back to our troubles. Our sanctification is long and laborious simply because we do not seek His face. We do not long for His presence. We do not seek to behold His glory, because we are insufficiently impressed. It is the pomp and the power, the dazzle and the sizzle, the bright lights and the baubles of the world around us that have captured our hearts. We don’t find His glory glorious enough, and so we are not yet like Him. We do indeed see through a glass darkly, a glass darkened by our love affair with the world. If we loved Him, we would seek Him. If we sought Him, we would find Him. If we found Him, we would see Him. And if we saw Him, we would be like Him. And believing this, John tells us, will purify us, “and everyone who thus hopes in Him purifies himself as He is pure” (v. 3). So may it be said of us.

Click here to go to source

Robert Charles Sproul, 2/13/1939 – 12/14/2017 was an American theologian, author, and ordained pastor in the Presbyterian Church in America. Dr. R.C. Sproul was founder and chairman of Ligonier Ministries, an international Christian education and discipleship organization located near Orlando, Fla. He was also copastor of Saint Andrew’s Chapel in Sanford, Fla., chancellor of Reformation Bible College, and executive editor of Tabletalk magazine. Dr. Sproul has contributed dozens of articles to national evangelical publications, has spoken at conferences, churches, and schools around the world, and has written more than one hundred books. He also served as general editor of the Reformation Study Bible.

     R.C. Sproul Books |  Go to Books Page

Read The Psalms In "1" Year

Psalm 33

The Steadfast Love of the LORD

10 The LORD brings the counsel of the nations to nothing;
he frustrates the plans of the peoples.
11 The counsel of the LORD stands forever,
the plans of his heart to all generations.
12 Blessed is the nation whose God is the LORD,
the people whom he has chosen as his heritage!

13 The LORD looks down from heaven;
he sees all the children of man;
14 from where he sits enthroned he looks out
on all the inhabitants of the earth,
15 he who fashions the hearts of them all
and observes all their deeds.
16 The king is not saved by his great army;
a warrior is not delivered by his great strength.
17 The war horse is a false hope for salvation,
and by its great might it cannot rescue.

ESV Study Bible

Judges 14

By Don Carson 7/31/2018

     Some of us have wondered why God has occasionally used in powerful ministry people blatantly flawed. This is not to say that God should only use perfect people, for that would mean he would be using no people. Nor am I referring to the fact that we all have weaknesses and faults of various kinds. George Whitefield, for instance, despite his enormous stature as a preacher and evangelist, did not fare very well on the marriage front, or in his (misguided) conviction that his son would be healed of his mortal illness. Virtually any Christian leader, whether from biblical times or more recent history, could not stand up under the onslaught of that sort of criticism. No, what I have in mind is the flaw that is so public and awful that one ponders two questions: (a) If this person is so powerful and godly, why the ugly fault? (b) If this person is so filled with the Spirit, why doesn’t that same Spirit enable him to clean up his act?

     There are no easy answers. Sometimes it is simply a matter of time. Judas Iscariot, after all, engaged in public ministry with the other eleven apostles — even miraculous ministry — yet with time proved apostate. The passage of time would show him up. But sometimes the flaws are there from the beginning to the end.

     That is true, it appears, in the life of Samson. The Spirit of God came upon him mightily; the Lord used him to curb the Philistines. But what is he doing marrying a Philistine woman, when the Law strictly forbade marriage to anyone outside the covenant community (Judg. 14:2)? When his parents warn him of the consequences, he simply overrides them, and they acquiesce (Judg. 14:3). True, they did not know that “this was from the LORD” (Judge. 14:4), in the same way that the selling of Joseph into slavery in Egypt was of the Lord; but that did not make the human actions right.

     Samson’s risky bet (Judg. 14:12-13) is more cocksure and greedy than it is wise and honorable. Of course, the Philistines are really cruel in the matter (Judg. 14:15-18, 20), but Samson’s murder of thirty men to fulfill the terms of the wager is motivated less by a desire to cleanse the land and restore the covenant people to strength than it is by personal vengeance. Similar things must be said about his tactics in the next chapter, and about his steamy living in the chapter after that.

     It appears, then, that Spirit-given power in one dimension of life does not by itself guarantee Spirit-impelled discipline and maturity in every dimension of life. It follows that the presence of spiritual gifts is never an excuse for personal sin.

Click here to go to source

Don Carson is research professor of New Testament at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in Deerfield, Illinois, and co-founder (with Tim Keller) of The Gospel Coalition. He has authored numerous books, and recently edited The Enduring Authority of the Christian Scriptures (Eerdmans, 2016).

     Don Carson Books |  Go to Books Page

The Constancy of a Pilgrim’s Life

By Ligon Duncan 1/2006

     It has been said that one hallmark of the Puritan view of the Christian life was the emphasis placed on being “constant” (or being steady and unchanging). Remember how John Bunyan puts the challenge to us to learn from the life of the pilgrim?

     Who would true valour see, let him come hither; one here will constant be, come wind, come weather. There’s no discouragement shall make him once relent his first avowed intent to be a pilgrim.

     That is, “if you want to know how to live a constant Christian life, come take a look at this guy.”

     The Puritans, and certainly Bunyan, highly valued the Bible’s accent on faithfully, consistently, tirelessly pursuing the Christian life with a view to the long haul. Key to this is the role of the ordinary means of grace (chief among them the reading/preaching of the Word, the right partaking of the sacraments, the engagement of the soul with God in prayer). If we are to manifest the constancy of the Christian pilgrim’s life then we will also place much stock in the ordinary means of grace.

     The Word, sacraments, and prayer — these are the ordinances given by God with which spiritual life is nurtured. By “ordinances” we mean spiritual instruments of grace and growth in grace appointed by God in the Bible. Here’s how the Westminster Assembly explained this in their Shorter Catechism, Question 88: “What are the outward and ordinary means whereby Christ communicates to us the benefits of redemption? Answer: The outward and ordinary means whereby Christ communicates to us the benefits of redemption are, his ordinances, especially the Word, sacraments, and prayer; all which are made effectual to the elect for salvation.”

     How does one go about living the Christian life? How does one walk in the way of salvation? How does one become a “constant Christian?” By a careful use of God’s appointed, ordinary and outward means of growth. Again, the assembly of divines gives this helpful summation of the Bible’s answer: by “faith in Jesus Christ, repentance unto life, with the diligent use of all the outward means whereby Christ communicates to us the benefits of redemption.” In other words, the constant Christian is strengthened for his pilgrimage by God’s grace held out to all who trust in Christ, bestowed and received through the ordinary means set forth in the Word.

     So, when we say that the Christian pilgrim highly values God’s ordinances and faithfully participates in the ordinary means of grace, we mean that the pilgrim believes the things that God says in the Bible are central to the spiritual health and growth of His people, are in fact central in his own Christian life. In other words, if God says in the Bible that the way His people grow is by a diligent use of His ordinary means, a true pilgrim believes God and lives accordingly.

     Thus, pilgrims (in order to know and grow in the true knowledge of God, and to keep fast in the way of faithfulness) delight in, highly value, and faithfully attend the public reading and preaching of the Word; mature in their assurance as they contemplate God’s saving promises to them each time they see baptism administered and joyfully commune in the Lord’s Supper; and engage in a life of prayer, especially expressed corporately in the local church.

     This isn’t just a Puritan thing though. It is a biblical thing. Throughout the New Testament, God explicitly instructs pastors and churches to do the following things: First, “Give attention to the public reading of Scripture, to exhortation and teaching” (1 Tim. 3:13 NASB); Second, “Preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort, with great patience and instruction” (2 Tim. 4:2 NASB); Third, “Make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you” (Matt. 28:19–20 NASB); Fourth, “This is My body, which is for you.… This cup is the new covenant in My blood; do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me. For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes” (1 Cor. 11:24–26 NASB); Fifth, “I urge that entreaties and prayers, petitions and thanksgivings, be made…. Therefore I want the men in every place to pray, lifting up holy hands” (1 Tim. 2:1, 8 NASB).

     These are the main ways God’s people grow and become constant. We are saved by grace through faith — indeed, by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone. But the means of God’s grace to bring us to faith and grow us in grace are the Word, prayer, and the sacraments. Nothing else we do in the church’s program should detract from these central means of grace; indeed, everything else we do should promote and coalesce with them. Nothing else is more important if we are to display the constancy of the pilgrim life.

     Walk this way, and you’ll be constant, come wind or weather.

Click here to go to source

     Dr. J. Ligon Duncan is the chancellor of Reformed Theological Seminary and the John E. Richards Professor of Systematic and Historical Theology. He has authored, coauthored, edited or contributed to more than 35 books.

     Ligon Duncan Books |  Go to Books Page

By Gleason Archer Jr.

The Date of the Exodus

     According to  1 Kings 6:1 the temple of Solomon was begun in the fourth year of his reign (i.e., 966 or shortly thereafter), which was the four hundred and eightieth year after the Exodus. This would give the exact date for the Exodus as 1445 B.C., in the third year of Amenhotep II (1447–1421). There may have been a few years more or less, if the figure of 480 was only meant to be a round number. This would mean that the Israelite conquest of Canaan would have commenced with the destruction of Jericho around 1405 (allowing for the forty years in the wilderness). This latter date has been confirmed by John Garstang’s excavations at the site of Jericho, Tell es-Sultan, from 1930 to 1936. On archaeological grounds he dated the Late-Bronze level (City D) at 1400 B.C.

     Further confirmation of this date is found in the statement of Jephthah recorded in  Judg. 11:26, where he reminds the Ammonite invaders that the Israelites have been too long in possession of the contested land of Gilead for the Ammonites to challenge their legal right to hold it: “While Israel dwelt in Heshbon and its towns, and in Aroer and its towns … three hundred years; wherefore did ye not recover them within that time?” (ASV). Since Jephthah’s period was admittedly earlier than the time of King Saul (whose reign began around 1050 B.C.), this certainly pushes the Israelite conquest back to 1400 B.C.

     Still further confirmation is found in Paul’s comment in  Acts 13:19–20, which according to the earliest reading (as preserved in Nestle’s text) states: “And when he [God] had destroyed seven nations in the land of Canaan, he gave them their land for an inheritance, for about four hundred and fifty years: and after these things [i.e., after the division of the land] he gave them judges until Samuel the prophet.” (This is the rendering of the RSV; the KJV follows a later, untrustworthy reading here.) In other words, the interval includes the Exodus itself (when the Hebrews left Egypt to take possession of Canaan,  Ex. 20:12 ), the Israelite conquest under Joshua, and the career of Samuel down to the date of David’s capture of Jerusalem ca. 995. (Cf.  Deut. 12:10, which states that the choice of a holy city for Jehovah’s sanctuary will be revealed after “He giveth you rest from all your enemies” — including apparently, the Jebusites in Jerusalem.) This means that the 450 years of  Acts 13 includes the period from 1445 to B.C. It goes without saying that a materially later date for the Exodus would be utterly irreconcilable with  Acts 13:19.

     But notwithstanding this consistent testimony of Scripture to the 1445 date (or an approximation thereof), the preponderance of scholarly opinion today is in favor of a considerably later date, the most favored one at present being 1290 B.C., or about ten years after Rameses II began to reign. A still later date, ca. 1225, is favored by a diminishing number of authorities (such as H. H. Rowley), but in the earlier decades of the twentieth century it found support even from conservatives like M. G. Kyle in ISBE (who dated the fifth year of Merneptah about 1250 B.C.) and J. D. Davis (who dated the fifth year in his Dictionary of the Bible, 4th ed., as 1320).

     J. Finegan lists five major arguments in support of the 1290 date: (1) the discrepancies between the Amarna Letters and the Hebrew record (in  Joshua, Judges, Samuel ); (2) the apparent absence of an agricultural civilization in Edom, Moab, and Ammon during the fourteenth century; (3) the impossibility of reconciling a 430-year sojourn with a Hyksos date for Joseph’s career; (4) the lack of evidence that Thutmose III did any building in the Delta region; (5) the mention of the city of Raamses in  Ex. 1:11 These will be dealt with one by one.

     As to (1), Finegan points to the fact that the letters from King Abdi-Hepa of Canaanite Jerusalem in the Amarna correspondence’ indicate that his city was in imminent danger of capture by the Habiru; yet  2 Sam. 5:6–9 shows that the Israelites did not capture Jerusalem until David’s reign. Hence the Habiru could not have been the Israelites, but an earlier, non-Israelite force of invaders. But the fallacy in this argument is obvious. The armies of Joshua did indeed menace Jerusalem, for they routed the Jerusalemite troops (together with their allies from Hebron, Jarmuth, Lachish, and Eglon) at the battle of Gibeon, and their king, Adoni-zedek, was subsequently flushed out of hiding and put to death ( Josh. 10 ). But neither the letters of Abdi-Hepa nor the Hebrew account in  Joshua states that the city itself was captured or destroyed. Not until after Joshua’s death, apparently, did the army of Judah storm Jerusalem and put it to the torch ( Judg. 1:8 ), and even then they did not permanently dispossess the Jebusites ( Judg. 1:21 ).

     As to (2), Finegan refers to the surveys of Nelson Glueck in the Transjordanian region, which failed to uncover any evidence of urban civilization or fortifications between 1900 and 1300 B.C. This means that there could have been no strong Edomite kingdom to oppose the Israelite advance up the east bank of the Dead Sea (cf.  Num. 20:14–21 ) back in 1405 B.C. Nor would there have been any strong Moabite - Midianite coalition to face under King Balak ( Num. 22–25 ), nor any armies of Sihon and Og to crush ( Num. 21 ). But Glueck’s investigations were largely in the nature of surface exploration, and could hardly have been called thorough. Moreover, there has come to light more recently a new line of evidence which seems to belie his deductions. In the Biblical Archaeologist for February 1953, G. Lankester Harding reported the discovery of an ancient tomb in Amman (BA XVI, no. 7: “Archaeological News from Jordan”) containing numerous artifacts (including black pricked ware, button-base vases, oil flasks, scarabs, and toggle pins) dating from about 1600 B.C. In Harding’s Antiquities of Jordan (1959) he also speaks of characteristic Middle Bronze pottery and other objects found at Naur and Mount Nebo. A sixteenth century tomb was discovered at Pella in 1967 (ASOR newsletter, Dec. 1967). A Late Bronze Age temple was uncovered under a runway at the Amman airport in 1955 (CT, 22 Dec. 1971, p. 26). Franken’s excavations at Deir Alla and those of Siegfried Horn at Heshbon have shown that the pottery of Transjordan was quite dissimilar from that produced on the west bank of the Jordan at the same period. Yamauchi suggests that Glueck mistakenly assumed the homogeneity of pottery from both regions and thus may have introduced confusion into his interpretation of the data (ibid. See H. J. Franken and W. J. A. Power [VT, xxi 71, pp. 119–23]; “Glueck’s Exploration in Eastern Palestine in the Light of Recent Evidence”). J. Bimson states, “I am forced to conclude, therefore, that there is no reason to date the Conquest in the 12th century B.C. Evidence from et-Tell does not support such a date, since it is not clear that there was a deliberate destruction of the Iron Age village at that time” (Redating the Exodus and Conquest, p. 65). Further excavation will no doubt uncover more products of this intermediate period and demonstrate once again the fallacy of hasty conclusions on the basis of superficial investigations.

     As to (3), the difficulty of reconciling the viziership of Joseph with the Hyksos period in Egypt (since Joseph’s career must have fallen in the first half of the nineteenth century according to the early date theory, and the Hyksos rule did not begin until 1730 or so), this discrepancy is freely admitted. But as has been already pointed out, the internal evidence of  Ex. 1 points to the Hyksos dynasty as furnishing the “new king who knew not Joseph,” and the Twelfth Dynasty as being the probable time of Joseph’s career. Therefore the point taken raises no difficulty whatsoever to a 1445 date for the Exodus.

     As to (4), the lack of evidence of building activity in the Delta during the reign of Thutmose III (1501–1447), there are several significant indications from archaeological discovery which point in a more positive direction. It is a well-known fact that Thutmose III erected two red granite obelisks in front of the temple of Ra’ in Heliopolis (situated at the base of the Delta); one of them now stands in London and the other in New York City. Since he describes himself in them as “Lord of Heliopolis,” it is fair to assume that he did conduct building operations in that city. Moreover, a scarab from the Eighteenth Dynasty refers to the birth of Amenhotep II (Thutmose’s son) as having taken place in Memphis (twenty-three miles below Heliopolis). This raises a strong presumption that Thutmose maintained his headquarters there from time to time, at least, and probably did so for the purpose of strengthening his fortifications and staging preparations for his numerous Asiatic campaigns. It is inconceivable that he could have made fourteen or more campaigns in Syria if he had not built extensive barracks, depots, and other structures to accommodate his troops. The land of Goshen with its large reservoir of manpower must have often been commandeered for these construction projects. Even as far south as Thebes, the tomb of his vizier Rekhmire shows Semitic slaves hard at work making and transporting bricks.

     As for Amenhotep II, discoveries at Bubastis (the Pi-beseth of Ezek. 30:17) uncovered by Naville in 1887–1889 included a red granite slab representing Amenhotep in worship before Amon-Ra’, “he who dwells in Perwennefer.” This calls to mind the close relationship which Amenhotep bore to the naval dockyard at Perwennefer near Memphis, over which his father had appointed him a commandant in his youth. W C. Hayes concludes that he maintained large estates at Perwennefer, and resided there for extended periods of time. In one inscription (ANET, p. 244) he speaks of riding from the royal stables in Memphis to visit the Sphinx at Gizeh. All this points to frequent royal residence in the Delta during the reign of Thutmose III (the pharaoh of the oppression) and Amenhotep II (the pharaoh of the Exodus)—conformable to the early date theory.

     In regard to (5), the appeal to the treasure city of Raamses in  Ex. 1:11, “we have seen that there is no possibility of reconciling the Mosaic narrative as it now stands, with a 1290 date.” This labor upon the city of Raamses must have been carried on prior to the birth of Moses, unless the  Ex. 1:15 account is out of chronological sequence and the name “Raamses” was an anachronism (and the strength of this whole argument is that this name was not an anachronism). Yet between 1300, the approximate date of the accession of Rameses II to the throne, and the year 1290 there is no room for the eighty years of Moses’ life prior to the event of the Exodus itself. Therefore the 1290 date cannot be seriously considered as a theory reconcilable with the accuracy of the Hebrew account. Actually the prime advocates of this view do not, as a rule, hold to the reliability of the Mosaic narrative, but (as in the case of Meek and Albright) deny that the Joseph tribes (Ephraim and Manasseh) ever sojoumed in Egypt, but rather the Levites alone, or possibly the tribe of Judah also.

     On the strength of the Israel stela of Merneptah the adherents of the 1290 date have rightly urged that the Israelites must already have been settled in Palestine at least by 1229 B.C., and that this makes it very difficult to hold the older theory that Merneptah (1234–1225) was the pharaoh of the Exodus. It is a necessary inference from the Merneptah stela that Israel was already in Palestine, dwelling among the Hittites, Ashkelon, Gezer, and the Horites ( 11.26 ff.). Kyle’s suggestion (in the ISBE article on the Exodus) that “Israel is laid waste, his seed is not” refers to the program of killing off the male babies of Israel eighty years before, while still enslaved in Egypt, is hardly worth serious consideration.

     A Survey of Old Testament Introduction

The Coming Prince

By Sir Robert Anderson 1841-1918

Chapter 4 The Vision By The River Of Ulai

     "The times of the Gentiles;" thus it was that Christ Himself described the era of Gentile supremacy. Men have come to regard the earth as their own domain, and to resent the thought of Divine interference in their affairs. But though monarchs seem to owe their thrones to dynastic claims, the sword or the ballot-box, — and in their individual capacity their title may rest solely upon these, — the power they wield is divinely delegated, for "the Most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever He will." (Daniel 4:25)

Daniel 4:25 that you shall be driven from among men, and your dwelling shall be with the beasts of the field. You shall be made to eat grass like an ox, and you shall be wet with the dew of heaven, and seven periods of time shall pass over you, till you know that the Most High rules the kingdom of men and gives it to whom he will.   ESV

     In the exercise of this high prerogative He took back the scepter He had entrusted to the house of David, and transferred it to Gentile hands; and the history of that scepter during the entire period, from the epoch to the close of the times of the Gentiles, is the subject of the prophet's earlier visions.

     The vision of the eighth chapter of Daniel has a narrower range. It deals only with the two kingdoms which were represented by the middle portion, or arms and body, of the image of the second chapter. The Medo-Persian Empire, and the relative superiority of the younger nation, are represented by a ram with two horns, one of which was higher than the other, though the last to grow. And the rise of the Grecian Empire under Alexander, followed by its division among his four successors, is typified by a goat with a single horn between its eyes, which horn was broken and gave place to four horns that came up instead of it. Out of one of these horns came forth a little horn, representing a king who should become infamous as a blasphemer of God and a persecutor of His people.

     That the career of Antiochus Epiphanes was in a special way within the scope and meaning of this prophecy is unquestioned. That its ultimate fulfillment belongs to a future time, though not so generally admitted, is nevertheless sufficiently clear. The proof of it is twofold. First, it cannot but be recognized that its most striking details remain wholly unfulfilled. [1] And secondly, the events described are expressly stated to be "in the last end of the indignation," (Daniel 8:19) which is "the great tribulation" of the last days, (Matthew 24:21) "the time of trouble" which is immediately to precede the complete deliverance of Judah. [2]

[1] I allude to the 2, 300 days of verse 14, and to the statement of verse 25, "He shall also stand up against the Prince of Princes, but he shall be broken without hand."
Daniel 8:19 He said, “Behold, I will make known to you what shall be at the latter end of the indignation, for it refers to the appointed time of the end.   ESV

Matthew 24:21 For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now, no, and never will be.   ESV

[2] "And there shall be a time of trouble such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time; and at that time thy people shall be delivered," — i. e., the Jews (Daniel 12:1).
Daniel 12:1 “At that time shall arise Michael, the great prince who has charge of your people. And there shall be a time of trouble, such as never has been since there was a nation till that time. But at that time your people shall be delivered, everyone whose name shall be found written in the book.   ESV

     It is unnecessary, however, further to embarrass the special subject of these pages by any such discussion. So far as the present inquiry is immediately concerned, this vision of the ram and the he-goat is important mainly as explanatory of the visions which precede it. [3]

[3] The following is the vision of the eighth chapter:

Daniel 8:1 1 In the third year of the reign of King Belshazzar a vision appeared to me, Daniel, after that which appeared to me at the first. 2 And I saw in the vision; and when I saw, I was in Susa the citadel, which is in the province of Elam. And I saw in the vision, and I was at the Ulai canal. 3 I raised my eyes and saw, and behold, a ram standing on the bank of the canal. It had two horns, and both horns were high, but one was higher than the other, and the higher one came up last. 4 I saw the ram charging westward and northward and southward. No beast could stand before him, and there was no one who could rescue from his power. He did as he pleased and became great.

5 As I was considering, behold, a male goat came from the west across the face of the whole earth, without touching the ground. And the goat had a conspicuous horn between his eyes. 6 He came to the ram with the two horns, which I had seen standing on the bank of the canal, and he ran at him in his powerful wrath. 7 I saw him come close to the ram, and he was enraged against him and struck the ram and broke his two horns. And the ram had no power to stand before him, but he cast him down to the ground and trampled on him. And there was no one who could rescue the ram from his power. 8 Then the goat became exceedingly great, but when he was strong, the great horn was broken, and instead of it there came up four conspicuous horns toward the four winds of heaven.

9 Out of one of them came a little horn, which grew exceedingly great toward the south, toward the east, and toward the glorious land. 10 It grew great, even to the host of heaven. And some of the host and some of the stars it threw down to the ground and trampled on them. 11 It became great, even as great as the Prince of the host. And the regular burnt offering was taken away from him, and the place of his sanctuary was overthrown. 12 And a host will be given over to it together with the regular burnt offering because of transgression, and it will throw truth to the ground, and it will act and prosper. 13 Then I heard a holy one speaking, and another holy one said to the one who spoke, “For how long is the vision concerning the regular burnt offering, the transgression that makes desolate, and the giving over of the sanctuary and host to be trampled underfoot?” 14 And he said to me, “For 2,300 evenings and mornings. Then the sanctuary shall be restored to its rightful state.
  ESV
The Coming Prince

  and also at this website. https://www.whatsaiththescripture.com/Voice/The.Coming.Prince.html#1-2

The Continual Burnt Offering

By H.A. Ironside - 1941

March 23
Job 1:20 Then Job arose and tore his robe and shaved his head and fell on the ground and worshiped. 21 And he said, “Naked I came from my mother’s womb, and naked shall I return. The LORD gave, and the LORD has taken away; blessed be the name of the LORD.”
22 In all this Job did not sin or charge God with wrong.
  ESV

     Suddenly bereft of nearly all that his heart held dearest, Job’s confidence in God shines out most brilliantly. He made no foolish charge against his Creator, as though such testings were a denial of His love. He recognized that he had to do with One infinite in wisdom, as in grace, and he could glorify Him in the hour of trial. Bereavements often prove just where the heart is. If occupied with persons, however dear, rather than with the Lord Himself, there will be a break down when human props are taken away. But  where God fills the vision of the soul, the heart will rest in Him though all else may vanish. 

I cannot tell why life should thus be shorn,—
Or heart thus emptied be:
Why stricken, broken, desolate, forlorn,
Should be my life’s decree:
Yet—through my blinding tears I fain would trace
The unchanged outline of Thy tender face.
--- J. Danson Smith

The Continual Burnt Offering: Daily Meditations on the Word of God

By James Orr 1907


II. THE HISTORICAL POSITION OF DAVID AS PSALMIST

In opposition to the Biblical tradition, the position taken up by the critics is, that the historical David is not an individual to whom compositions like the  Psalms can with propriety be attributed: and, generally, that the  Psalms imply a stage of religious development far in advance of that of the Davidic age. We do not go back on the question of the religious development, further than to remind the reader that, till lately, critical experts felt no difficulty on this point, but would here ask whether the accounts we have of David are such as to negative his authorship of many of the  Psalms. We assume that the accounts we have rest on good prophetic narratives, when the memory of David’s personality and reign was still fresh, and when his virtues and failings were recorded with equal fidelity.

1. We begin with a brief survey of David’s career.

(1) It will not be denied that, in the history, David’s character as a young man is as free from blemish as anyone could wish. He is chosen by Samuel above the other sons of Jesse on the ground that “man looketh on the outward appearance, but Jehovah looketh on the heart.” Saul’s servants attest regarding him that “he is cunning in playing, and a mighty man of valour, and a man of war, and prudent in speech, and a comely person, and Jehovah is with him.” His character comes out at its best in his encounter with Goliath. Here we see the whole man revealed — his dauntlessness, his faith in God, his unerring skill with the sling, his quiet modesty and decision of character, the energy that slumbered behind. The women who came out to meet him with chants and music only echoed the universal feeling that in this stripling lay the makings of the kingliest man in Israel.

(2) In his life at the court of Saul, David’s character is equally admirable. As a popular hero he had no rival; he was fast friend to Jonathan; he was set over the men of war; he ate at the king’s table, and soon became Saul’s son-in-law. But honours like these did not make his brain whirl, or his feet slide. His record at court is a strictly honourable one. He “went out whithersoever Saul sent him, and behaved himself wisely; and Saul set him over the men of war, and it was good in the sight of all the people, and also in the sight of Saul’s servants.” Another record about him is — and this is after the tide of favour had turned, and he had become the object of Saul’s deadly jealousy: “And David behaved himself wisely in all his ways, and Jehovah was with him. And when Saul saw that he behaved himself very wisely, he stood in awe of him. But all Israel and Judah loved David; for he went out and came in before them.” David’s position, we see from the narrative, soon became a very difficult one. Jonathan was with him, but Saul had become his bitter enemy. His life was sought, both openly and by plot and intrigue, and, with the change in the king’s mood, envious, rancorous tongues would not be wanting to shoot their shafts at him. But, amidst all, as David showed no vanity or pride in the day of his prosperity, so now he makes no attempt, by counter-intrigue, to retaliate upon, or overthrow his enemies, in the day of adversity. Saul deals wrongly towards him, but he behaves with unimpeachable fidelity towards Saul. His life at court maintains the promise of his boyhood.

(3) David is next beheld in another light, as chief of a band of outlaws, maintaining a precarious existence among the caves and fastnesses of Southern Judea. The position was not one of his seeking, but, driven into it, he made the best of it a man could. His first task was to reduce this band of broken, desperate men — many of them, probably, like himself, the victims of misgovernment and oppression — into something like order and discipline, and in this, it is evident, he admirably succeeded. His next task was to find for them useful employment. The term “freebooter” is sometimes applied to David at this period of his career; but if by “freebooter” is meant a chief subsisting by lawless plunder, nothing could be further from the truth. The employment David found for his men was of a different order. Part of it, as we see from the case of Nabal, consisted in acting as a kind of armed police, protecting the flocks and herds of the districts in which they lived from the raids of the Philistines, or of the robber - tribes of the desert. “The men,” said Nabal’s servants, “were very good unto us, and we were not hurt, neither missed we anything, so long as we were conversant with them, when we were in the fields; they were a wall unto us both by night and by day, all the while we were with them keeping the sheep.” The other part of their employment lay in direct war against the Philistines, when the latter came out on their marauding expeditions. The relief of the town of Keilah is an instance. A man would have been more than human had he made no slips, committed no mistakes, in such straits; but such as David’s were, e.g., his deception of Ahimelech and flight to Achish — an initial failure of faith — they are impartially recorded, and, taken as a whole, the tenor of his life in this period is singularly to his credit. He was at the time the object of unremitting persecution by Saul. Against this one man, innocent of crime, with his 600 followers, Saul was not ashamed to bring into the field an army of 3000, hunting him from rock to rock, and district to district, setting a price upon his head, and gladly availing himself of information treacherously given by those with whom David was in hiding. In light of these facts, it is difficult to exaggerate the nobleness of David’s conduct. Not one act did he do, through all these years of persecution, which might be construed into rebellion against Saul; and when twice, in the heat of Saul’s pursuit of him, that monarch’s life was at his mercy, twice, against the wishes of his followers, he magnanimously spared him. It was another false step, but probably prompted by the same desire to avoid collision with Saul, when, in a mood of despair, he betook himself a second time to Gath, there, by acceptance of Ziklag, to become a vassal of the Philistines — an act which involved him in a course of evasion impossible to justify, and led to complications that nearly proved disastrous.

(4) At length the discipline of trial came to an end, and David is seen firmly planted on the throne as ruler. Saul was slain on Gilboa, and in deep-toned and affecting strains, remembering not the evil, but the good that was in the fallen king, David poured out his soul in touching lament for him and Jonathan. The way was now clear for David to ascend the throne, and he did so, first at Hebron, as king of Judah, then, seven years after, at Hebron again, as king of all Israel. His great powers were now to be displayed to full advantage. Saul’s reign, begun with promise, had ended in darkness and disaster. His death left the kingdom in disunity and disorganisation, a prey to Philistine oppression; religion was trampled under foot, and there was no security for person or property. In no long space of time, David had cleared the country of its invaders, had restored to it its independence, had united its tribes, had re-established its liberties upon a just foundation, and had done much to revive the waning influence of religion. With true soldierly instinct, he fixed his eye on the rock fortress of Jebus as the natural capital of the nation, and one of his first steps was to possess himself of this stronghold. His next care was to bring up the ark of God, and reorganise the worship of Jehovah at Zion. Powerful confederations having been formed to crush his rising power, he called out his forces, and struck a succession of blows, which not only delivered him from the danger, but made him overlord of the whole country from the river of Egypt to the Euphrates. He had even in contemplation the building of a temple; but this the divine voice forbade, while rewarding his intention with the promise that his seed should sit upon his throne for ever.

Such were some of David’s services to his age; surveying them impartially, we cannot wonder that his memory should be embalmed with lively gratitude in the minds of the Israelites as that of their first great and godlike king. Over against these services are to be placed the blots on his private life and reign: his polygamy — no sin, however, by the then existing code — his overindulgence to his children, some acts of severity in war, but, above all, the one great, black crime of his adultery with Bathsheba and the murder of her husband Uriah. Nothing can palliate this crime; yet even here, while condemning David, it is necessary to try to be just. For a Pharaoh, a Nebuchadnezzar, a Xerxes, or other Oriental monarch to covet the wife of a subject, and give orders for the death of her husband, would have seemed to most ancient historians a venial enough fault, and they would probably not have occupied half a dozen lines with the relation. It is the Biblical history itself, by the bold relief into which it throws this shameful incident, — by its impartiality in narrating, in denouncing, and in declaring the punishment of this sin of David, — which makes it bulk so largely in our minds, and inspires us with such just horror in regard to it. But it is not to be forgotten that the same book which tells us of David’s fall, tells also of his bitter and anguished repentance for the fall, and of the sad and heavy strokes of retribution by which it was avenged. The story of Absalom’s rebellion is a long drawn out commentary on the words in which Nathan announced to David the sorrow that would fall upon his house; but it is also one of the finest revelations in the history of the piety and submissiveness of the man who is said to be “after God’s own heart.” David’s sins were great, but we may trust a Carlyle or a Maurice for a just estimate of his character, rather than the caviller whose chief delight is to magnify his faults.

2. In this varied, many-sided, strangely - chequered life, with its startling vicissitudes, its religious aspiration and endeavour, its heights and depths of experience of good and evil, — with its love of music and gift of lyric song, — with the incitements to the use of that gift springing from the companionship of prophets like Samuel and Nathan, from the promises they gave, and the hopes for the future of the kingdom they inspired, — can anyone say that there is not abundant material for  Psalm - composition, or sufficient motive or skill to engage in it? Had the anointing to be king, the trials at Saul’s court, the vicissitudes of the wilderness persecution, the bringing-up of the ark, the promises of Nathan, the rebellion of Absalom, the sin with Bathsheba itself and the penitence that followed, no power in them to draw forth such psalmody? It is with these very occasions that the  Psalms ascribed to David in the first books are traditionally connected. Can we permit ourselves to believe, without convincing evidence, that tradition was all wrong about this, and that, as Professor W. R. Smith and others will have it, David’s religious muse found utterance rather “in sportful forms of unrestrained mirth,” so that even in the time of Amos, David appears “as the chosen model of the dilettante nobles of Ephraim, who lay stretched on beds of ivory, anointed with the choicest perfumes, and mingling music with their cups in the familiar manner of Oriental luxury.” Let those believe this who can: we cannot. David’s history, whether we gather it from “Saul-Source,” or “David-Source,” or “Jerusalem-Source,” presents no resemblance to this picture of dandified frivolity. Are we to suppose that when David left Nathan after receiving the promises of  2 Sam. 7, it was to give expression to his adoring feelings in sportful ditties — or that Amos thought he did?

In asking whether David actually wrote  Psalms, we seem to find firm foothold in one composition, the genuineness of which it is difficult to dispute —  Ps. 18. There are two recensions of this  Psalm, one in the  Psalter, the other in  2 Sam. 22, and both ascribe the authorship to David. Internal evidence so strongly bears out the claim, that, till recently, few were bold enough to challenge it. Certainly, if any  Psalm is David’s, it is this one, and some, as Schultz, who latterly allowed him no other (earlier he had conceded ten), make exception of this. The  Psalm is interesting in many ways; not least by its strong assertion that Jehovah alone is God (ver.  31 ). Its spiritual strain in such expressions as, “As for God, His way is perfect,” the allusion to a “word of Jehovah” which is “tried” (ver.  30 ), the reference to the promises to David and his seed (ver.  50 ), etc., are stumbling - blocks in the way of the modern theory, which compel resort to a later dating. Yet, if this  Psalm is given up, it is difficult to see what reliance can be put on any nation’s recollections of its great authors or poets. If, however, David wrote this long and virile  Psalm, the probabilities are enormous that he wrote others: the question only is, how many? Baethgen is not sure of more than three ( Ps. 3, 4, 18. ); Ewald, who had a good feeling for style, gave him eleven, with fragments of others; Hitzig, fourteen; Bleek, “no inconsiderable number”; while Delitzsch extended the number to over forty. In the uncertainty attaching to the titles, it is doubtful if any definite conclusions as to number can be reached; though we are disposed to allow more weight than it is now customary to do to the titles of at least the first and second books, which seem to have formed originally (with exclusion of the separate collection,  Ps. 42–50. ) a collection of Davidic  Psalms. In any case we are probably warranted in holding that the number of Davidic  Psalms is not small, and includes most of those which have, with reasonable unanimity, been ascribed to the royal singer. Besides  Psalms which reflect the writer’s personal experiences — under persecution, in penitence, in flight from Absalom, in gratitude for deliverance — there are others evidently composed for special occasions, as, e.g., the bringing up of the ark to Zion ( Ps. 24 ). Most naturally, also, as has been already suggested, those  Psalms which mention the “tabernacle” on Zion ( Pss. 15, 27 ) may be referred to this reign. Be the number of Davidic  Psalms, however, greater or smaller, the inference as to the level of religious belief and practice is not much affected. As anyone can see in reading the  Psalms, practically the same elevated idea of God, the same zeal for righteousness, the same spirit of trust and confidence in Jehovah, the same religious aspirations and affections, are present in all. The fact affords a valuable corroboration of our previous conclusions.

     The Problem of the Old Testament


  • No Place for Truth
  • Do Not Love the World
  • Upper Room

#1 Alistair Begg | Ligonier

 

#2 Kevin DeYoung | Ligonier

 

#3 Sinclair Ferguson | Ligonier

 


     Devotionals, notes, poetry and more

coram Deo
     8/2006    The Light of Glory

     Humanistic historians and secular sociologists are eager to assign their carefully crafted, far-reaching labels to just about anything. Centuries-long periods of history and entire generations of people have been adorned with meaningless titles and simplistic definitions. From the so called “baby-boom generation” to the “me generation” and “generation x,” our society has determined that bestowing a general category upon an entire population based on age is appropriate. Similarly, entire periods of history are known for the type of metal prominently used during that particular period, for instance, the “Bronze Age.” We have “golden” ages and ages of “enlightenment,” the “Age of Reason” and the infamous “Dark Ages.”

     Although modern historians have generally done away with using the term “Dark Ages” (AD 476–1000), it is still a label that is stuck in the minds of most of us when we think of the early Middle Ages. We too often forget, however, that the dark ages did not begin in the fifth century in Europe, nor did they end at the turn of the first millennium AD. The dark ages began long ago in the garden of Eden when Adam and Eve rebelled against the Lord and fell into a corrupt state. And while no respectable historian would ever assign the title “Dark Ages” to the larger part of the history of civilization, since the fall, man has witnessed a dark age.

     Nevertheless, ever since the fall, the Lord has shed the light of His gospel upon the world. In Genesis 3:15, we hear the words of the first gospel spoken to our great ancestors, and throughout history we see how God has brought His light to His people in their darkest hours. In the Old Testament, we read the christological prophecy of Isaiah in which he heralds the coming Light of the World: “The people who walked in darkness have seen a great light; those who dwelt in a land of deep darkness, on them has light shined” (Isaiah 9:2). In the New Testament, we witness the fulfillment of that proclamation: “In him was life, and the life was the light of men. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it” (John 1:4–5). Although the history of sixth-century civilization is much darker than secularists can comprehend, there is a glorious light that shines in the darkness. In the sixth century as well as in the twenty-first century, the Lord enables His light to shine through us so that we might live coram Deo in a dark world.

     click here for article source

     Dr. Burk Parsons (@BurkParsons) is editor of Tabletalk magazine, senior pastor of Saint Andrew’s Chapel in Sanford, Fla., a visiting lecturer at Reformed Theological Seminary, and a Ligonier Ministries teaching fellow. He is editor of John Calvin: A Heart for Devotion, Doctrine, and Doxology.

Ligonier     coram Deo (definition)
American Minute
     by Bill Federer

     On this date, March 23, 1775, Patrick Henry spoke to the Second Virginia Convention, which, because of British hostilities, was meeting in St. John’s Church. He proclaimed: “There is a just God who presides over the destines of nations… who will raise up friends to fight our battle for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave…. Patrick Henry concluded: “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death.”

American Minute

Lean Into God
     Compiled by Richard S. Adams


Thou hast created us for Thyself, and our heart is not quiet until it rests in Thee.
--- Saint Augustine
The Confessions of Saint Augustine


You can give without loving. But you cannot love without giving.
--- Amy Carmichael, missionary to India
A Life God Rewards Devotional

All my theology is reduced to this narrow compass
Christ Jesus came into this world to save sinners.
--- Archibald Alexander
Beyond the Sunset
I know up on the top you are seeing great sights, but down at the bottom we, too, should have rights.
--- Dr. Seuss
Yertle the Turtle and Other Stories

... from here, there and everywhere

Journal of John Woolman 3/23
     University of Virginia Libray 1994

     1763-1769. Religious Conversation with a Company met to see the Tricks of a Juggler -- Account of John Smith's Advice and of the Proceeding of a Committee at the Yearly Meeting in 1764 -- Contemplations on the Nature of True Wisdom -- Visit to the Families of Friends at Mount Holly, Mansfield, and Burlington, and to the Meetings on the Sea-Coast from Cape May towards Squan -- Some Account of Joseph Nichols and his Followers -- On the different State of the First Settlers in Pennsylvania who de depended on their own Labor, compared with those of the Southern Provinces who kept Negroes -- Visit to the Northern Parts of New Jersey and the Western Parts of Maryland and Pennsylvania; also to the Families of Friends at Mount Holly and several Parts of Maryland -- Further Considerations on keeping Slaves, and his Concern for having been a Party to the Sale of One -- Thoughts on Friends exercising Offices in Civil Government.

     THE latter part of the summer, 1763, there came a man to Mount Holly who had previously published a printed advertisement that at a certain public-house he would show many wonderful operations, which were therein enumerated. At the appointed time he did, by sleight of hand, perform sundry things which appeared strange to the spectators. Understanding that the show was to be repeated the next night, and that the people were to meet about sunset, I felt an exercise on that account. So I went to the public-house in the evening, and told the man of the house that I had an inclination to spend a part of the evening there; with which he signified that he was content. Then, sitting down by the door, I spoke to the people in the fear of the Lord, as they came together, concerning this show, and labored to convince them that their thus assembling to see these sleight-of-hand tricks, and bestowing their money to support men who, in that capacity, were of no use to the world, was contrary to the nature of the Christian religion. One of the company endeavored to show by arguments the reasonableness of their proceedings herein; but after considering some texts of Scripture and calmly debating the matter he gave up the point. After spending about an hour among them, and feeling my mind easy, I departed.

John Woolman's Journal

Andrew Murray's Absolute Surrender
     Practical religion. The Christian life

     It is God who will enable you to carry out the surrender.

     And, on the other side, come and say: "I give myself absolutely to God, to let Him work in me to will and to do of His good pleasure, as He has promised to do."

     Yes, the living God wants to work in His children in a way that we cannot understand, but that God's Word has revealed, and He wants to work in us every moment of the day. God is willing to maintain our life. Only let our absolute surrender be one of simple, childlike, and unbounded trust.

     God Blesses When You Surrender

     This absolute surrender to God will wonderfully bless.

     What Ahab said to his enemy, King Ben-hadad--"My lord, O king, according to thy word I am thine, and all that I have"--shall we not say to our God and loving Father? If we do say it, God's blessing will come upon us. God wants us to be separate from the world; we are called to come out from the world that hates God. Come out for God, and say: "Lord, anything for Thee." If you say that with prayer, and speak that into God's ear, He will accept it, and He will teach you what it means.

     I say again, God will bless you. You have been praying for blessing. But do remember, there must be absolute surrender. At every tea-table you see it. Why is tea poured into that cup? Because it is empty, and given up for the tea. But put ink, or vinegar, or wine into it, and will they pour the tea into the vessel? And can God fill you, can God bless you if you are not absolutely surrendered to Him? He cannot. Let us believe God has wonderful blessings for us, if we will but stand up for God, and say, be it with a trembling will, yet with a believing heart:

     "O God, I accept Thy demands. I am thine and all that I have. Absolute surrender is what my soul yields to Thee by divine grace."

     You may not have such strong and clear feelings of deliverances as you would desire to have, but humble yourselves in His sight, and acknowledge that you have grieved the Holy Spirit by your self-will, self-confidence, and self-effort. Bow humbly before him in the confession of that, and ask him to break the heart and to bring you into the dust before Him. Then, as you bow before Him, just accept God's teaching that in your flesh "there dwelleth no good thing" (Rom. 7:18), and that nothing will help you except another life which must come in. You must deny self once for all. Denying self must every moment be the power of your life, and then Christ will come in and take possession of you.

     When was Peter delivered? When was the change accomplished? The change began with Peter weeping, and the Holy Spirit came down and filled his heart.

     God the Father loves to give us the power of the Spirit. We have the Spirit of God dwelling within us. We come to God confessing that, and praising God for it, and yet confessing how we have grieved the Spirit. And then we bow our knees to the Father to ask that He would strengthen us with all might by the Spirit in the inner man, and that He would fill us with His mighty power. And as the Spirit reveals Christ to us, Christ comes to live in our hearts forever, and the self-life is cast out.

     Let us bow before God in humility, and in that humility confess before Him the state of the whole Church. No words can tell the sad state of the Church of Christ on earth. I wish I had words to speak what I sometimes feel about it. Just think of the Christians around you. I do not speak of nominal Christians, or of professing Christians, but I speak of hundreds and thousands of honest, earnest Christians who are not living a life in the power of God or to His glory. So little power, so little devotion or consecration to God, so little perception of the truth that a Christian is a man utterly surrendered to God's will! Oh, we want to confess the sins of God's people around us, and to humble ourselves. We are members of that sickly body, and the sickliness of the body will hinder us, and break us down, unless we come to God, and in confession separate ourselves from partnership with worldliness, with coldness toward each other, unless we give up ourselves to be entirely and wholly for God.

     I am using the 1895 Public Domain version. Below is an Amazon link for a modern copy.

Absolute Surrender (The Colportage Library)

Proverbs 13:7-8
     by D.H. Stern

7     There are those with nothing who pretend they are rich,
also those with great wealth who pretend they are poor.
8     The rich man may have to ransom his life,
but a poor man gets no threats.

Complete Jewish Bible : An English Version of the Tanakh (Old Testament) and B'Rit Hadashah (New Testament)
The end of confession
     by Dr. David Wells


     This relattvizing process, which has been handled with the utmost subtlety by scholars, has emerged among the laity in a rather more blatant fashion. During the 1980s, the Vatican, especially under Pope John Paul and Cardinal Ratzinger, has placed great emphasis on the importance of confession and has disciplined some teachers who have appeared to be undercutting Vatican interests. But polls of the Catholic laity indicate that these actions of the pope and his guardians of Catholic doctrine amount to little more than sticking fingers in a dike through which torrents of relativity are now pouring. The American Catholic church is awash with such amazing confessional diversity that its members are frequently indistinguishable from a variety of Protestants and even non-Christians. This stunning diversity in a church that has always been known for its interest in confessional conformity certainly raises the question of whether the Modernists, who were condemned in uncommonly fierce terms in 1907, might not have lost the battle but now, by a strange turn of events, have won the war. Indeed, the decree Instruction on the Ecdesial Vocation of the Theologian, issued in 1990 with the specific intention of silencing Church teachers who disagree with the Church and making that silence a condition of their retaining their roles as Church teachers, sounds remarkably like some of the papal utterances that were sent forth from Rome as Modernism was just gaining momentum at the turn of the century. What has now to be seen is only whether the dissenters will this time succeed in overwhelming the Church or whether, once again, they will be dislodged.

     On the Protestant side, it is true that ritual assent continues to be given to the idea that the Bible must, in some fashion, be used confessionally. The problem, however, is that it is used in so many different ways, as David Kelsey has argued, that its role is no longer binding in the same way. Paul Tillich, Karl Barth, and Carl Henry all believed that their theology was "biblical," but the sense in which each did so was quite different, and hence the way in which Scripture functioned to authorize their theologies was quite different. Although the idea of confession has lingered on, clearly what is confessed no longer belongs in or is drawn from the same universe of meaning. Far more commonly, what is confessed has meaning only within a private world of religious consciousness, and this private world all too frequently resonates with the pluralism of the modern world.

     What makes the disappearance of confession in academic circles almost inevitable, barring an occasional episode of rebellion such as that mounted by Karl Barth and his allies, is that there is now an insurmountable coalition between the Enlightenment idea that it is the subject who defines reality and the universities that are now structured not only to make this idea normative but also to make its orthodox alternative unacceptable.

     In twentieth-century universities, especially in America, the fact that confession is unwanted is communicated in a number of ways. There has been a trend (which peaked in the 1960s) toward replacing departments of theology with departments of religious studies. The new script for study is human experience, not the teaching of the Bible or, for that matter, of the Church. This script encompasses all human experience in all of its religious shades; it is no longer tolerable to restrict academic consideration to what is Christian or Western. The method of study is now scientific, objective, and comparative; the starting point is the assumption that all religions are works of human interpretation and that no one religion has "the truth." And, because the study is conducted under the aegis of the social scientists rather than that of the clergy or theologians, the credibility of the whole undertaking requires that it take place not in the context of the old spirit of belief but rather in the context of the most audacious, irreverent, and skeptical questions, even if the result is to create a maze through which befuddled students will not easily find a way. Unhappily, the demand for pluralistic values, to which unstinting support is given in these departments, itself invariably becomes an unyielding orthodoxy. Faculty in many of these departments will not tolerate those whose views are not pluralistic.


     The damage to human lives is everywhere. Is there any hope?

     (Mt 16:16–19)You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” 17 And Jesus answered him, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah! For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven. 18 And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

No Place for Truth: or Whatever Happened to Evangelical Theology?


The Great Divorce - A Dream
     C.S. Lewis

          7

     Although I watched the misfortunes of the Ghost in the Bowler with some complacency, I found, when we were left alone, that I could not bear the presence of the Water-Giant. It did not appear to take any notice of me, but I became self-conscious; and I rather think there was some assumed nonchalance in my movements as I walked away over the flat rocks, down-stream again. I was beginning to be tired. Looking at the silver fish which darted over the river-bed, I wished greatly that to me also that water were permeable. I should have liked a dip.

     ‘Thinking of going back?’ said a voice close at hand. I turned and saw a tall ghost standing with its back against a tree, chewing a ghostly cheroot. It was that of a lean hard-bitten man with grey hair and a gruff, but not uneducated voice: the kind of man I have always instinctively felt to be reliable.

     ‘I don’t know,’ said I. ‘Are you?’

     ‘Yes,’ it replied. ‘I guess I’ve seen about all there is to see.’

     ‘You don’t think of staying?’

     ‘That’s all propaganda,’ it said. ‘Of course there never was any question of our staying. You can’t eat the fruit and you can’t drink the water and it takes you all your time to walk on the grass. A human being couldn’t live here. All that idea of staying is only an advertisement stunt.’

     ‘Then why did you come?’

     ‘Oh, I don’t know. Just to have a look round. I’m the sort of chap who likes to see things for himself. Wherever I’ve been I’ve always had a look at anything that was being cracked up. When I was out East, I went to see Pekin. When …’

     ‘What was Pekin like?’

     ‘Nothing to it. Just one darn wall inside another. Just a trap for tourists. I’ve been pretty well everywhere. Niagara Falls, the Pyramids, Salt Lake City, the Taj Mahal …’

The Great Divorce

My Utmost For The Highest
     A Daily Devotional by Oswald Chambers

                Am I carnally minded?

Whereas there is among you jealousy and strife, are ye not carnal? --- 1 Cor. 3:3.

     No natural man knows anything about carnality. The flesh lusting against the Spirit that came in at regeneration, and the Spirit lusting against the flesh, produces carnality. “Walk in the Spirit,” says Paul, “and ye shall not fulfil the lusts of the flesh”; and carnality will disappear.

     Are you contentious, easily troubled about trifles? ‘Oh, but no one who is a Christian ever is!’ Paul says they are, he connects these things with carnality. Is there a truth in the Bible that instantly awakens petulance in you? That is a proof that you are yet carnal. If sanctification is being worked out, there is no trace of that spirit left.

     If the Spirit of God detects anything in you that is wrong, He does not ask you to put it right; He asks you to accept the light, and He will put it right. A child of the light confesses instantly and stands bared before God; a child of the darkness says—‘Oh, I can explain that away.’ When once the light breaks and the conviction of wrong comes, be a child of the light, and confess, and God will deal with what is wrong; if you vindicate yourself, you prove yourself to be a child of the darkness.

     What is the proof that carnality has gone? Never deceive yourself; when carnality is gone it is the most real thing imaginable. God will see that you have any number of opportunities to prove to yourself the marvel of His grace. The practical test is the only proof. ‘Why,’ you say, ‘if this had happened before, there would have been the spirit of resentment!’ You will never cease to be the most amazed person on earth at what God has done for you on the inside.

My Utmost for His Highest

The Unborn Daughter
     the Poetry of R.S. Thomas

           The Unborn Daughter

On her unborn in the vast circle
  Concentric with our finite lives;
  On her unborn, her name uncurling
  Like a young fern within the mind;
  On her unclothed with flesh or beauty
  In the womb's darkness, I bestow
  The formal influence of the will,
  The wayward influence of the heart,
  Weaving upon her fluid bones
  The subtle fabric of her being,
  Hair, hands and eyes, the body's texture,
  Shot with the glory of the soul.

Selected poems, 1946-1968

Teacher's Commentary
     The Choice: Numbers 13–14

      Israel had been given instruction in responsibility on the way to the Promised Land. When they arrived at the borders of Palestine, Moses sent 12 men out in pairs to spy out the land. The 12 were to evaluate the strength of the peoples, their numbers, and whether the land was rich or poor. God was giving Israel information, that the dangers might be known and weighed against their confidence in God.

     Ten of the 12 spies were overawed by the strength of the enemy and by the fortified towns they found in the land. Two of the spies, Caleb and Joshua, encouraged the people to trust in God. “We should go up and take possession of the land, for we can certainly do it” (13:30). But the fears of the others prevailed. Crying in fright and anguish, the whole congregation was ready to choose other leaders to guide them back to Egypt!

     Stunned by the choice Israel was making, Moses and Aaron “fell face down in front of the whole Israelite assembly gathered there” and Caleb and Joshua tore their clothing (an action indicating great depth of feeling). They urged Israel, “Do not rebel against the Lord.… Their protection is gone but Lord is with us” (14:9).

     This affirmation of faith showed vividly the response that Israel should have made when faced with their choice. Instead, “the whole assembly talked about stoning them.”

     The choice had been made.

     Now, as a responsible people, Israel had to accept the full consequences of her decision.

     God appears. At this point the Lord visibly intervened. His “glory” suddenly flashed from the tabernacle. The action of Israel justified their total destruction.… God could make of Moses alone a greater people than Israel. But Moses again prayed for the people, and they were pardoned.

     Yet even with the pardon, the people of Israel would bear the consequences of their decision.

      “Not one of the men who saw My glory and the miraculous signs I performed in Egypt and in the desert but who disobeyed Me and tested Me 10 times—not one of them will ever see the land I promised on oath to their forefathers. No one who has treated Me with contempt will ever see it” (vv. 22–23).

     Only Caleb and Joshua were exempted, because they had responded to God with trust. The rest would be led out again into the wilderness, to wander there for 38 years.

     “Your bodies will fall—every one of you 20 years old or more who was counted in the census and who has grumbled against Me. Not one of you will enter the land I swore with uplifted hand to make your home except Caleb … and Joshua” (vv. 29–30).

     When the children of the next generation had learned to accept responsibility and to trust God, then they would come again to the Promised Land. A people who refused to trust could never experience the Promised Land’s rest.

     Unfair? Lest we think this judgment was too severe, we need to look at the aftermath. When Moses told the people the judgment of God, they “mourned greatly.” And the next morning they jumped up—and mounted an attack on the land they had been unwilling to approach. But this was after God had expressly commanded them to turn back to the wilderness!

     Moses cried out, “Why are you disobeying the Lord’s command? This will not succeed!” (v. 41) But the people stumbled on to meet the enemy, though God’s ark and His presence remained in the camp.

     They were defeated and pursued.

     The people had once again demonstrated that they simply would not listen to God or respond to Him. Over and over the failure of Israel to be obedient led them into disaster. Yet they refused to be responsible.

     The lesson still had to be learned. Until it was learned, the people would know only the tragic consequences of disobedience with each wrong choice.


The Teacher's Commentary
Swimming In The Sea of Talmud
     Eruvin 13b

     D’RASH

     Who among us hasn’t, like Rabbi Yannai, feared being out of place? While each of us wants to be an individual, none of us wants to stick out like a sore thumb. Rabbi Yannai’s words aptly reflect this anxiety. Rabbi Yannai is talking about planning for important events in life, and by asking to be buried neither in white nor in black in preparation for two possible eventualities is thinking ahead to save himself embarrassment, in this case, after death. Wearing olaryin will allow him to be neither like a groom among mourners nor like a mourner among grooms.

     Many of us have had the experience, at one time or another, of walking into a room and feeling inappropriately dressed. A friend says, “Let’s go out for a casual dinner,” but her definition of casual and ours do not mesh. Because of the way we are dressed, we end up fidgeting in our seat all night long, like a mourner among grooms. We may remember the one man who, for whatever reason, came to a black-tie reception wearing a light-colored suit. Perhaps he could not afford a tuxedo; maybe he misread the invitation. Whatever the reason, he stood out like a groom among mourners.

      We can avoid embarrassment by planning ahead, not only in how we dress but in other kinds of preparations. In order to enjoy the opera and not feel out of place, you read the libretto to understand the plot and story-line. Similarly, if you are invited to a life-cycle ritual in a different religious tradition, or even in your own tradition, you might benefit and feel more comfortable by finding out the customs of manners and dress beforehand.

     Suppose you are invited to a simḥat bat, the new ritual that has developed over past decades as a special way of welcoming a baby girl into the Jewish community. If this is the first simḥat bat you are attending, you may feel apprehensive about feeling out of place. A little research, however, will help increase the comfort level. “How long does a simḥat bat last? How formal is it? Will I need any preparation? Are there others with whom I can share my anxieties?”

     We can never be 100 percent sure that we’ll feel comfortable where we are. Life is just too complicated for that. Still, we want to feel as much at ease as possible, wherever we are. By properly thinking and planning ahead, we can make sure that we fit in and that we do not feel like either a groom among mourners or a mourner among grooms.

     Both are the words of the living God.

     Text / Rabbi Abba said in the name of Shmuel: “For three years there was a dispute between Bet Shammai and Bet Hillel, the former saying: ‘The law follows our views, and the latter saying: ‘The law follows our views.’ A voice from heaven proclaimed: ‘Both are the words of the living God but the law follows Bet Hillel.’ ” Since both are the words of the living God, why did Bet Hillel merit having the law follow their views? Because they were kind and modest; they used to teach their views and the views of Bet Shammai; moreover, they used to mention Bet Shammai’s views before their own.

     Context / Another of the discussions and disagreements of Bet Hillel and Bet Shammai found on the very same page in the Talmud: For two and a half years, Bet Shammai and Bet Hillel disagreed: One said: “It would have been better if humans had not been created.” The other said: “It is better that humans have been created.” They voted and concluded: “It would have been better if humans had not been created. But now that humans have been created, let them search their [past] actions.” Others say: “Let them look into their [future] deeds.”

     Hillel and Shammai were the two great rabbinic leaders at the end of the first century, B.C.E. The disciples of these two men over the next century were known, respectively, as Bet (“The House of”) Hillel and Bet Shammai. These two groups shaped much of Judaism as we know it today during the critical years just prior to, and immediately after, the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Over three hundred of their halakhic disputes are recorded throughout the Talmud. Many scholars used to see a philosophical or sociological basis for the legal disagreements. Bet Hillel is often more lenient and may have represented the lower classes. Bet Shammai usually takes a stricter position, and its members may have come from the wealthier upper classes. However, this approach is disputed today.

     In our section, Bet Hillel and Bet Shammai have been arguing for a considerable amount of time over whose views best reflected God’s will. The answer comes from a bat kol, a “small voice,” which is understood to be a message from God in heaven. This message could come as an actual voice, or it could be revealed in a dream. Once prophecy came to an end, a bat kol was the sole means of receiving direct communication from God.

     Both Bet Hillel and Bet Shammai believed that in their opinions and legal rulings, they were uncovering and transmitting the will of God. The Written Law, the Torah given by God to Moses on Mount Sinai, was often imprecise or even silent about many details and issues. What the Rabbis attempted to do in the Oral Law (the Midrash and the Talmud) was to try to discover what God had in mind. They struggled to understand the Torah and to apply its teachings to their own times. They often came up with very different interpretations. But, as we see here, they deeply believed that each interpretation reflected God’s truth. Nevertheless, the law—what was to be normative, accepted behavior—had to be fixed; otherwise the unity of the people would be destroyed by numerous practices. More often than not, Bet Hillel’s views were chosen not because Bet Hillel was right and Bet Shammai was wrong. Rather, Bet Hillel’s views became law, according to the Talmud, as a reward for the way they treated those they disagreed with.


Swimming in the Sea of Talmud: Lessons for Everyday Living
The Imitation Of Christ
     Thomas A Kempis

     Book Three - Internal Consolation

     The Fourteenth Chapter / Consider The Hidden Judgments Of God Lest Youu Become Proud Of Your Own Good Deeds

          The Disciple

     YOU thunder forth Your judgments over me, Lord. You shake all my bones with fear and trembling, and my soul is very much afraid. I stand in awe as I consider that the heavens are not pure in Your sight. If You found wickedness in the angels and did not spare them, what will become of me? Stars have fallen from heaven, and I—I who am but dust—how can I be presumptuous? They whose deeds seemed worthy of praise have fallen into the depths, and I have seen those who ate the bread of angels delighting themselves with the husks of swine.

     There is no holiness, then, if You withdraw Your hand, Lord. There is no wisdom if You cease to guide, no courage if You cease to defend. No chastity is secure if You do not guard it. Our vigilance avails nothing if Your holy watchfulness does not protect us. Left to ourselves we sink and perish, but visited by You we are lifted up and live. We are truly unstable, but You make us strong. We grow lukewarm, but You inflame us. Oh, how humbly and lowly should I consider myself! How very little should I esteem anything that seems good in me! How profoundly should I submit to Your unfathomable judgments, Lord, where I find myself to be but nothing!

     O immeasurable weight! O impassable sea, where I find myself to be nothing but bare nothingness! Where, then, is glory’s hiding place? Where can there be any trust in my own virtue? All vainglory is swallowed up in the depths of Your judgments upon me.

     What is all flesh in Your sight? Shall the clay glory against Him that formed it? How can he whose heart is truly subject to God be lifted up by vainglory? The whole world will not make him proud whom truth has subjected to itself. Nor shall he who has placed all his hope in God be moved by the tongues of flatterers. For behold, even they who speak are nothing; they will pass away with the sound of their words, but the truth of the Lord remains forever.

The Imitation Of Christ

Take Heart
     March 23

     They are still in the world, and I am coming to you. Holy Father, protect them by the power of your name …so that they may be one as we are one. --- John 17:11.

     How [does] this prayer give evidence of Christ’s tender care and love to his people? ( The Whole Works of the Reverend Mr. John Flavel ... )

     1. His love and care was obvious in the choice of mercies for them. He does not pray for health, honor, long life, riches, and the like, but for their preservation from sin, spiritual joy in God, sanctification, and eternal glory. No mercies but the very best in God’s treasure will content him. The rest he is content should be dispensed indiscriminately by providence, but these he will settle as a heritage on his children. See the love of Christ! Look over your spiritual inheritance in Christ, compare it with the richest, fairest, sweetest inheritance on earth, and see what poor things these are to yours.

     2. He pleaded your concerns with God at a time when a world of sorrow surrounded him on every side, a cup of wrath mixed and ready to be delivered into his hand. At that very time when the clouds of wrath grew black, a storm coming such as he never felt before, one would have thought all his care, thoughts, and diligence would have been employed on his own account to mind his own sufferings. No, he forgets his own sorrows to mind our peace and comfort.

     If Christ so amply showed his care and love for his people in this his parting hour, then we conclude the perseverance of the saints is unquestionable. Do you hear how he pleads! how he argues! how he chooses his words and sets them in order, how he winds up his spirit to the very highest pitch of zeal and fervency? Can such a Father deny the persistence and strong reasonings and pleading of such a Son? O, it can never be! He cannot deny him. Christ has the art and skill of prevailing with God. If the heart and hand of God were hard to be opened, yet this would open them, but when the Father himself loves us and is inclined to do us good, who can doubt of Christ’s success?
--- John Flavel

Take Heart: Daily Devotions with the Church's Great Preachers

On This Day | March 23
     S.D.G.

     “Mission statements” for organizations and individuals are prevalent today. Johann Sebastian Bach did that 200 years ago.

     Johann Sebastian Bach, the youngest in a family of German musicians, was baptized on March 23, 1685, two days old, in Eisenach. He excelled at music, and his skills increased when, at age 9, he moved in with an older brother who taught music.

     Johann also loved Scripture. He collected a library of 83 volumes that included the Bible, Luther’s writings, and the works of Luther’s followers. He soon combined his love of music and Scripture, penning this note in the margin of 1 Chronicles 25, the chapter in which King David commissioned the temple musicians: “This chapter is the true foundation for all God-pleasing music.”

     Johann would travel any distance to hear good music. Often he tramped 30 miles to Hamburg or 60 miles to Celle to hear famous organists. At age 20, hearing that a renowned organist would perform in Lubeck, he persuaded his superiors to give him a month’s leave of absence, and he made the 200-mile trip by foot.

     Three years later he announced his life’s purpose: to create “well-regulated church music to the glory of God.” He believed music should exist only for God’s glory, and when he sat down to compose he often scribbled J.J. on his blank pages: Jesu Juva—Help me, Jesus. At the manuscript’s end, he jotted S.D.G.—Soli Deo Gloria—to God alone, the glory.

     Bach served as court musician at Weimar and Cothen, then taught music in Leipzig until his death. He fathered 20 children during his life and hundreds of compositions.

     He received little fame during his lifetime and died in relative obscurity. His grave was not marked. After his death, his music was largely forgotten until Mendelssohn rediscovered it. Bach himself had remained modest. When a friend once praised his skill as an organist, he shrugged and smiled. “There is nothing very wonderful about it,” he said. “You have only to hit the right notes at the right moment and the instrument does the rest.”

     David and the temple officials chose the descendants of Asaph, Heman, and Jeduthun to be in charge of music. They were to praise the LORD by playing cymbals, harps and other stringed instruments.
--- 1 Chronicles 25:1.

On This Day 365 Amazing And Inspiring Stories About Saints, Martyrs And Heroes

Morning and Evening
     Daily Readings / CHARLES H. SPURGEON

          Morning - March 23

     “His sweat was as it were great drops of blood falling down to the ground.”
--- Luke 22:44.

     The mental pressure arising from our Lord’s struggle with temptation, so forced his frame to an unnatural excitement, that his pores sent forth great drops of blood which fell down to the ground. This proves how tremendous must have been the weight of sin when it was able to crush the Saviour so that he distilled great drops of blood! This demonstrates the mighty power of his love. It is a very pretty observation of old Isaac Ambrose that the gum which exudes from the tree without cutting is always the best. This precious camphire-tree yielded most sweet spices when it was wounded under the knotty whips, and when it was pierced by the nails on the cross; but see, it giveth forth its best spice when there is no whip, no nail, no wound. This sets forth the voluntariness of Christ’s sufferings, since without a lance the blood flowed freely. No need to put on the leech, or apply the knife; it flows spontaneously. No need for the rulers to cry, “Spring up, O well;” of itself it flows in crimson torrents. If men suffer great pain of mind apparently the blood rushes to the heart. The cheeks are pale; a fainting fit comes on; the blood has gone inward as if to nourish the inner man while passing through its trial. But see our Saviour in his agony; he is so utterly oblivious of self, that instead of his agony driving his blood to the heart to nourish himself, it drives it outward to bedew the earth. The agony of Christ, inasmuch as it pours him out upon the ground, pictures the fulness of the offering which he made for men.

     Do we not perceive how intense must have been the wrestling through which he passed, and will we not hear its voice to us? “Ye have not yet resisted unto blood, striving against sin.” Behold the great Apostle and High Priest of our profession, and sweat even to blood rather than yield to the great tempter of your souls.


          Evening - March 23

     "I tell you that, if these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out."Luke 19:40.

     But could the stones cry out? Assuredly they could if he who opens the mouth of the dumb should bid them lift up their voice. Certainly if they were to speak, they would have much to testify in praise of him who created them by the word of his power; they could extol the wisdom and power of their Maker who called them into being. Shall not we speak well of him who made us anew, and out of stones raised up children unto Abraham? The old rocks could tell of chaos and order, and the handiwork of God in successive stages of creation’s drama; and cannot we talk of God’s decrees, of God’s great work in ancient times, in all that he did for his church in the days of old? If the stones were to speak, they could tell of their breaker, how he took them from the quarry, and made them fit for the temple, and cannot we tell of our glorious Breaker, who broke our hearts with the hammer of his word, that he might build us into his temple? If the stones should cry out they would magnify their builder, who polished them and fashioned them after the similitude of a palace; and shall not we talk of our Architect and Builder, who has put us in our place in the temple of the living God? If the stones could cry out, they might have a long, long story to tell by way of memorial, for many a time hath a great stone been rolled as a memorial before the Lord; and we too can testify of Ebenezers, stones of help, pillars of remembrance. The broken stones of the law cry out against us, but Christ himself, who has rolled away the stone from the door of the sepulchre, speaks for us. Stones might well cry out, but we will not let them: we will hush their noise with ours; we will break forth into sacred song, and bless the majesty of the Most High, all our days glorifying him who is called by Jacob the Shepherd and Stone of Israel.

Morning and Evening

Amazing Grace
     March 23

          THERE SHALL BE SHOWERS OF BLESSING

     Daniel W. Whittle, 1840–1901

     I will send down showers in season; there will be showers of blessing.
(Ezekiel 34:26)


     How disheartening it is to see a once fertile field that has been rendered hardened and useless by a drought. Land that was intended to produce a rich harvest for its owner lies barren and lifeless. As Christians, God desires that our lives bear much fruit for Him. But the soil of our hearts must be right if we want the seeds of righteousness to grow. The parable of the sower in Matthew 13 teaches that it is possible to have four different kinds of soil in our lives: An unconcerned soil, a shallow soil, a polluted soil, and a good soil—one that responds and produces a bountiful harvest.

     At times many Christians feel as though they are in a spiritual drought. God seems removed. Spiritual activities are just routine business. Prayer and Bible reading become monotonous. Christian friends seem critical and irritating. We feel that life is really a valley of dry bones (Ezekiel 37:1–4). Then we cry out to God for a fresh outpouring of His grace, not just drops of mercy but showers of blessing. And soon the answer comes—perhaps in the form of a Scripture passage, a sermon, a song, an encouraging remark, a new insight. Our souls revive and we are once again able to “raise a harvest of righteousness” (James 3:18).

     “There Will Be Showers of Blessing” was the product of one of the outstanding gospel duos of the past century, Major Daniel Whittle, the evangelist, and musician James McGranahan. Together these two traveled extensively for a number of years in a very successful evangelism ministry. They also collaborated on a number of popular gospel songs still widely used today. This hymn first appeared in Gospel Hymns No. 4, 1883.

     “There shall be showers of blessing”—this is the promise of love; there shall be seasons refreshing, sent from the Savior above.
     “There shall be showers of blessing”—precious reviving again; over the hills and the valleys sound of abundance of rain.
     “There shall be showers of blessing”—send them upon us, O Lord; grant to us now a refreshing; come and now honor Thy Word.
     “There shall be showers of blessing”—O that today they might fall, now as to God we’re confessing, now as on Jesus we call!
     Chorus: Showers of blessing, showers of blessing we need; mercy drops round us are falling, but for the showers we plead.


     For Today: Genesis 12:3; Deuteronomy 7:13; Psalm 72:6; 1 Peter 1:3.

     If perhaps you should feel “spiritually dry,” first reflect on the condition of the soil of your heart. Then claim God’s promise for “showers of blessing.” Sing as you go ---

Amazing Grace: 366 Inspiring Hymn Stories for Daily Devotions

A Guide to Fervent Prayer
     A.W. Pink | (1886-1952)


          Through the Blood of the Everlasting Covenant

     In the last place, consider that the great act of God here spoken of is said to be “through the blood of the everlasting covenant.” As to the exact meaning of these words there has been no little confusion in the minds of different writers on this Epistle; and while a full canvassing of this interesting question is really outside the scope of the present article, yet some of the more erudite of our readers would be displeased if we failed to make a few remarks thereon. So I shall ask others kindly to bear with me while I deal with a somewhat technical detail. A careful reading through of the Epistle to the Hebrews shows that mention is made therein of “the covenant” (Hebrews 10:29), “a better covenant” (Hebrews 8:6), “a new covenant” (Hebrews 8:8), and here to “the everlasting covenant.” Not a few able men have concluded that reference is made to the same thing throughout, but with them I cannot agree. It is quite clear from Hebrews 8:6-13 that the new and better covenant made with the spiritual Israel and Judah (that is, the Church) stands in opposition to the first (Hebrews 8:7) or old (Hebrews 8:13) covenant made with the nation of Israel at Sinai (that is “Israel after the flesh”). In other words, the contrast is between Judaism and Christianity under two different covenants or economies, whereas “the everlasting covenant” is the antitheses of that covenant of works made with Adam as the federal head of the human race.

     Though the covenant of works was first in manifestation, the everlasting covenant, or covenant of grace, was first in origination. In all things Christ must have the preeminence (Col. 1:18), and thus God entered into compact with Him before Adam was created. That compact has been variously designated as the “covenant of redemption” and the “covenant of grace.” In it God made full arrangements and provisions for the salvation of His elect. That everlasting covenant has been administered, under different economies, throughout human history, the blessings of the same being bestowed on favored individuals all through the ages. Under the Old Covenant, or Judaism, the requirements and provisions of the everlasting covenant were typified or foreshadowed particularly by means of the moral and ceremonial law; under the New Covenant, or Christianity, its requirements and provisions are set forth and proclaimed in and by the Gospel. In every generation repentance, faith, and obedience have been required of those who would (and do) partake of its inestimable blessings (Isa. 55:3). In his Outlines of Theology, the renowned theologian A. A. Hodge says this:

     “The phrase ‘mediator of the covenant’ is applied to Christ three times in the New Testament (Heb. 8:6; 9:15; 12:24), but as in each case the term for covenant is qualified by either the adjective ‘new’ or ‘better,’ it evidently here is used to designate not the covenant of grace properly, but that new dispensation of that eternal covenant which Christ introduced in person in contrast with the less perfect administration of it which was instrumentally introduced by Moses.”

          Christ, the Mediator of an Everlasting Covenant

     Thus we take those words “the blood of the everlasting covenant” at their face value, as referring to the eternal compact that God entered into with Christ. In the light of the preceding phrases of Hebrews 13:20, it is evident that “the blood of the everlasting covenant” has a threefold connection. First, it is connected to the Divine title here employed. God became historically “the God of peace” when Christ made propitiation and confirmed the eternal compact with His own blood (Col. 1:20). From before the foundation of the world God had purposed and planned that peace between Himself and sinful men (Luke 2:13, 14) that Christ was to make; everything connected with the same had been eternally agreed upon between Them. Secondly, it points to the fact of Christ’s death. As the righteous Judge of all, God the Father was moved by the shedding of Christ’s precious blood to restore Him from the grave and to exalt Him to a place of supreme honor and authority (Matthew 28:18; Phil. 2:5-11). Since the Surety had fully carried out His part of the contract, it behooved the Ruler of this world to deliver Him from prison as that which was righteously due to Him. Thirdly, this blessed phrase is connected to Christ’s office. It was by the shedding of His blood for them, according to covenant agreement, that our Lord Jesus became “that great shepherd of the sheep,” the One who would seek out God’s elect, bring them into the fold, and there minister to, provide for, and protect them (John 10:11, 15).

     God’s bringing back our Lord Jesus from the dead was not done simply by contract, but also on account of His merits, and therefore it is attributed not barely to “the covenant” but to “the blood” of it. As God the Son, He merited or purchased it not, for honor and glory were His due; but as the God-man Mediator He earned His deliverance from the grave as a just reward for His obedience and sufferings. Moreover, it was not as a private person but as the Head of His people that He was delivered, and that ensured their deliverance also. If He was restored from the tomb “through the blood of the everlasting covenant,” equally so must they be. Scripture ascribes our deliverance from the grave not only to the death of Christ but to His resurrection as well. “For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him:” (1 Thess. 4:14; cf. Rom. 4:25). Thus assurance is given to the Church of its full and final redemption. God expressly made promise to the Shepherd of old: “As for thee also, by the blood of thy covenant I have sent forth thy prisoners out of the pit wherein is no water [that is, the grave]” (Zech. 9:11, brackets mine). As it was “by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place” (Heb. 9:12), so also on the ground of the infinite value of that blood we also enter the heavenly throne room (Heb. 10:19). As He declared, “because I live, ye shall live also” (John 14:19).

          The Well-Grounded Petition

     We turn now to the petition itself. “Now the God of peace . . . Make you perfect in every good work to do his will, working in you that which is wellpleasing in his sight, through Jesus Christ.” This verse is intimately related to the whole of the preceding one, and the blessed connection between them inculcates a lesson of great practical importance. It may be stated, simply, as follows: God’s wondrous working in the past should deepen our confidence in Him and make us to seek at His hands blessings and mercies for the present. Since He so graciously provided such a Shepherd for the sheep, since He has been pacified toward us and not a frown now remains upon His face, since He has so gloriously displayed both His power and His righteousness in bringing back Christ from the dead, a continuance of His favor may be safely counted upon. We should expectantly look to Him day by day for all needed supplies of grace. The One who raised our Savior is well able to quicken us and make us fruitful to every good work. Let us therefore eye “the God of peace” and plead “the blood of the everlasting covenant” in every approach to the mercy seat.

     More specifically, God’s bringing back Christ from the dead is His infallible guarantee to us that He will fulfill all His promises to the elect, even all the blessings of the everlasting covenant. This is clear from Acts 13:32-34: “And we declare unto you glad tidings, how that the promise which was made unto the fathers, God hath fulfilled the same unto us their children, in that He hath raised up Jesus again…and as concerning that He raised Him from the dead. . . He said [by that action], I will give you the sure mercies of David” (brackets mine). By restoring Christ from the dead, God fulfilled the grand promise made to the Old Testament saints (in which all His promises were virtually contained) and gave pledge for the performance and accomplishment of all future ones, thereby giving virtue to them. The “sure mercies of David” are the blessings that God swore to in the everlasting covenant (Isa. 55:3). The shedding of Christ’s blood ratified, sealed, and established forever every article in that covenant. By bringing Him back from the dead God has ensured to His people that He will infallibly bestow upon them all those benefits which Christ obtained for them by His sacrifice. All those blessings of regeneration, pardon, cleansing, reconciliation, adoption, sanctification, preservation, and glorification were given to Christ for His redeemed, and are safe in His hand.

     By His mediatorial work Christ has opened a way whereby God can bestow, consistently with all the glory of His perfections, all the good things that flow from those Divine perfections. As Christ’s death was necessary that believers might receive those “sure mercies” according to the Divine counsels, so His resurrection was equally indispensable, so that living in heaven He might impart them to us as the fruits of His travail and the reward of His victory. God has fulfilled to Christ every article for which He engaged in the everlasting covenant: He has brought Him from the dead, exalted Him to His own right hand, invested Him with honor and glory, seated Him upon the mediatorial throne, and given Him that Name which is above every name. And what God has done for Christ, the Head, is the guarantee that He will perform all that He has promised to Christ’s members. It is a most glorious and blessed consideration that our all, both for time and eternity, depends wholly upon what passed between the Father and Jesus Christ: that God the Father remembers and is faithful to His engagements to the Son, and that we are in His hand (John 10:27-30). When faith truly apprehends that grand fact, all fear and uncertainty is at an end; all legality and talking about our unworthiness silenced. “Worthy is the Lamb” becomes our theme and song!

          This Kind of Praying Produces Spiritual Stability

     How tranquilizing and stabilizing it is to us when we consider that we have a personal interest in all the eternal acts that passed between God the Father and the Lord Christ on our behalf even before man was created, as well as in all those acts that were transacted between the Father and the Son in and throughout the whole of His mediatorial work that He wrought and finished here below. It is this covenant salvation, in its full blessedness and efficacy, apprehended by faith, that alone can lift us out of ourselves and above our spiritual enemies, that can enable us to triumph over our present corruptions, sins, and miseries. It is wholly a subject for faith to be engaged with, for feelings can never provide the basis for spiritual stability and peace. Such can only be obtained by a consistent feeding upon objective truth, the Divine counsels of wisdom and grace made known in the Scriptures. As faith is exercised thereon, as the record of the eternal engagements of the Father and Son are received into the spiritual mind, peace and joy will be our experience. And the more faith feeds upon objective truth, the more are we strengthened subjectively, that is, emotionally. Faith regards every past fulfillment of God’s promises as a certain evidence of His fulfilling all the rest of His promises to us, in His own good time and way. Especially will faith regard God’s fulfillment of His promise to bring back our Lord Jesus from the grave in this light. Has the Shepherd Himself been raised from the dead by the glory of the Father? Just as surely, then, will all His sheep be delivered from death in sin, quickened to newness of life, sanctified by the Spirit, received into Paradise when their warfare is ended, and raised bodily to immortality at the last day.


     Tomorrow starts Chapter 3

A Guide to Fervent Prayer

2015 National Conference
     Ligonier


DeYoung, Godfrey, Nichols,
Sproul, Sproul Jr.






Sinclair Ferguson, Steven J. Lawson,
Russell Moore, R.C. Sproul




     ==============================      ==============================


Angelology 014 | The Works Of Satan
John 13:27 | 10-20-2019 | Dr. Andrew Woods





Living in an Unholy World
Albert Mohler | Ligonier






A Holy Vision
R.C. Sproul | Ligonier





Holy Devotion
Alistair Begg | Ligonier






Worshiping a Holy God
Hebrews 12:14-24 | R.C. Sproul





Responding to Holiness
Jerry Bridges | Ligonier






The Spirit of Holiness
Sinclair Ferguson | Ligonier





Upsetting the World
R.C. Sproul | Ligonier






The Offense of the Gospel
Doug Wilson | Ligonier





Counting it All Joy
John Piper | Ligonier






Five Errors
W. Robert Godfrey | Ligonier